Chicago Indymedia : http://chicago.indymedia.org
Chicago Indymedia

LOCAL Commentary :: Civil & Human Rights : Globalization : Labor : Protest Activity

Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Being a part of the Anarchist Bloc on Mayday was an empowering experience for us and the marchers around us.
Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

In the days and weeks leading up to Mayday '06, there had been discussions amongst Chicago anarchists about how to respond to the burgeoning immigrant's rights movement. The relevance of this issue and its connection to wider struggles is obvious to us. The general feeling was that we wanted to stand in solidarity with the marchers, but not be a distraction from them or alienate anyone with our militance. After all, there were going to be many undocumented people there who would not appreciate being put at risk of arrest or deportation. We also wanted to draw some connections between the conditions for workers and immigrants in the US, and things like NAFTA or the FTAA (I'm guessing that NAFTA's destructive effect on the Mexican economy is one of the reasons behind the increase in "illegal" immgrants in the US from 3 million in 1988 to 11 or 13 million now, and is driving down wages here as well). With this in mind, we still wanted to march as an anarchist-identified bloc, because Mayday belongs to us too. We decided that Black Bloc was unnecessary, and tried to get our friends to wear white as per the organizers' call-out, some of us creatively wearing white bandannas and masks, and many of us not being masked at all.

So, my two friends and I arrived at Haymarket around 9:30 AM to hang out with our buddies the Wobblies. After schmoozing for 45 minutes or so, we all had a short feeder march over to the main rally point at Union Park, while the creepy Teamster guys stayed at the monument. My friends and I crossed the park to Ashland and Washington where the anarchist bloc was assembling. This was a slightly more punk-rocky looking bunch, some of whom apparently didn't get the memo about not coming in Black Bloc gear. No matter, we were a diversely dressed spectrum of folks from clean and Bougie-looking to dirty-crusty. We hung out for a while, making flags, modifying some stolen commie-red flags, stenciling T-shirts, playing a-games and Bombs and Shields, banging on drums and passing out some of those cards form the Chicago Workers' Collaborative, with a number for people to call if they get harassed on the job for participating in the march. After a while there were something like 50 to 60 of us circle-A types. The march had been leaving the park for a while, and we decided to pack up and merge into it about half-way through. It was slow going, because the cops were corralling the march into the center two lanes of Randolph St. For out-of-towners: Randolph is a 4-lane street, but with concrete dividers between the two center lanes and the one-way lanes on the outside. Some of the marchers were getting impatient with the giant <a href="http://cbs2chicago.com/slideshows/local_slideshow_121120248/view?slide=33">funnel</a> the cops had set up to crowd everybody into the lanes. Some of the people ahead of us were going down a side street (Wasington Blvd) and turning the corner to head back to Randolph and re-join the march. We decided to follow, not exactly as a breakaway, but just to get out of the damn park and join the march already. As we were doing this, about five cops showed up and told us to go the main way. A few of us had slipped through already and were waving for us to follow, so we surged through and around them, no problem. In the confusion, another 50 or 100 marchers followed us down the side street and on the sidewalk. We were in high spirits, having flexed a muscle that felt real good for the first time in a while. So, we turned the corner and headed back to Randolf.

When we got there we saw that everybody was tightly crowded in the middle part of Randolph, moving very slowly and looking very uncomfortable. The only thing seperating them from the wide-open one-way lanes and diagonaly parking lanes was a thin ribbon of yellow police tape and the occasional wooden barricade. We pulled down the tape and encouraged people to cross the small median to the side lanes, occasionally encountering groups of 2 or 3 cops futilely telling us to stop. We had gone maybe a block east on Randolph when I looked back and saw thousands of people crossing over the tape and the medians behind us! People who had been marching relatively unenergetically for an half our or an hour enthusiastiacly joined us in pulling down tape and chanting, "Si Se Puede!" We opened up the eastbound lane of Randolf almost all the way to the highway overpass. There were a handfull of protest marshalls and cops who were annoyed with us, but we kept going with the main march and let them try to argue with a crowd of tens of thousands that they couldn't have a particular lane of pavement. I doubt they had much luck. Right past the overpass, we marched by the Haymarket statue. The entire block the monument is on was surrounded by metal barricades. A few of us wanted to try and challenge the barricades, but most of us still thought that the parade route would take us back that way at 4:30 (I found out later that that had been scrapped, by the organizers or the police, I'm not sure which). So we continued into and through downtown where we drummed and danced and joined in chants and generally had a good time. After a while, some people got us to play this game where we would hold up the whole march by stopping our banners, crouching for a count of 8 and then dash like mad up to the people in front of us. Most of the crowd enjoyed this, including one random guy who tried to get us to do it every 5 minutes or so. A few of us were getting annoyed of it, considering that there were people who were walking with the assistance of canes near us, so it was dangerous for them. Eventually we made it to Grant Park, where we passed by our friends at the Food Not Bombs table who were giving out coffee. We decided to have a meeting in a baseball field near where the rally was ending, to talk about what to do when we got back to Haymarket.

This was about 3PM. At this point I still thought that the march would be heading back in that direction, but I then was told that that had been changed. Most of us still wanted to go to Haymarket, but worried that if we tried to march over there in a breakaway the police would stop us. We talked about different ways to go over there, and eventually decided that it would be best to roll up our banners and flags, not play our drums, and walk on the sidewalks to Federal Plaza, which is about halfway between Grant Park and Haymarket. Then we'd continue to the now-seperate Labor rally by marching in the streets. At 3:30 we set out, and had an uneventful walk in the direction of Federal Plaza. The streets and sidewalks were still crowded with stragglers making their way to Grant Park as well as folks starting to catch the bus or train home. When we got to the Plaza, we unfurled our banners and flags, pulled our drumsticks back out, and stepped back into the streets.
There were still about 50 or 60 of us, but this time we weren't surrounded by hundreds of thousands of peaceful protesters, so I felt we were a bit more vulnerable. Despite that, we still made it several blocks through downtown Chicago without seeing a single cop. When the occasional unmarked car did come by us flashing its lights we either went around or jumped quickly back to the sidewalks. When we were still a quarter to half mile or so away from Haymarket a few more cops on foot had met up with us and frightened us back onto the sidewalk. They followed us closely with their snarls and glares and muttering about what terrible people we were and debated how severely they'd like to beat us. When we finally made it to the monument, we saw that the labor unions had set up a stage, and what do you know, there's a rhythm band with djembes and other drums playing. So, we played our drums with them, and we danced and hung out with some of the IWW folk who are slowly arriving. The mainstream labor union people watched us with bemused stares. They probably didn't know what to make of all these punkish looking kids with torn pieces of black cloth or garbage bags crudely attached to sticks. Not that all of us were dressed as punks, but those that did stood out in the crowd.

About 10 or 15 minutes into this, one of us sneaks over the metal barricades that the cops had put around the monument and begins climbing the statue, with the intention of attaching a red-and-black flag to it. A bunch of the anarchists saw this happening and enthusiastically took apart the barricades and climbed the statue. This infuriated the 15 or 20 or so cops there, who assaulted the statue and forced everybody down. While the whole crowd of 200 or so Labor folk watched (and did little or nothing) the rest of the anarchists came over to help their friends. A brief scuffle ensued, where a few people from both sides got hit with sticks and poles and police bikes, but noone really got hurt. The cops tried to arrest three or four of us in the confusion. For some reason I'm not sure of, they let us all go. Maybe they realized they were being jerks (doubtful). Maybe one or some of the labor union folks convinced them to do it (unlikely but possible). My guess is, they just weren't feeling lucky that day, what with all sorts of Wobblies and teamsters and other union folk starting to show up to a rally. Anyway, the anarchos either hid in the growing crowd or continued to argue with the cops over barriers. When about 60 riot cops showed up with a paddywagon and one of the police surveillance trucks, things seemed like they were getting pretty sketchy. One of us said they'd overheard cops talking about how they would wait for the rally to end and the union folk go home, and then they'd "get" the anarchists. So, we were getting pretty nervous, and about worried whether the police would try and snatch the folks they'd previously let go. After a larger (500+?) crowd had assembled and the unions started their speeches (where they conveniently ignored the explictily anarchist history of haymarket as well as what had happened 20 minutes ago before their eyes), I snuck out down an alley, then phoned a comrade to tell him I'd gotten out safe. A few others snuck out, the rest I later heard were able to just walked out normally. Still, I was feeling anxious until I'd ridden my bike all the way back home.

So, I'd say overall that it was the best protest I've ever been to. We achieved all our goals for the day: Showing solidarity, not being alienating or imperialistic in our behavior, not bringing the heat to a large gathering of illegal immigrants, getting a decent sized group of anarchists to haymarket on Mayday, not getting arrested, having fun. I think we had just the right level of militancy appropriate to the event. A few dumb things happened, for example a few newspaper boxes got knocked down on the way to Haymarket, but it wasn't really a big deal. One note that I must add is that during the baseball outfield meeting, there were perhaps 10 mostly white anarchists who seemed to be doing most of the talking. Also, perhaps if we'd not marched in the streets at all on our way to Haymarket, the heat wouldn't have followed us there and we'd have been able to get away with a lot more at the monument. In any case, I'd say it was a near-complete success. Our inter-group solidarity and communication skills seem to be rapidly improving, and I credit a lot of that to A-Games. If that continues, anarchists in Chicago may be a force to be reckoned with once again!
 
 

Add a new comment
Title
Author
  Create a new account
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

right on.

that's pretty close on to how i would describe my day.

the knocking over of newspaper boxes was unnecessarily provocative and unproductive. the aim of the breakaway march, and the low-key approach to its start, after all, was to *not* attract unwanted attention.

as far as the meeting in the park was concerned, let's first acknowledge that of a group of about thirty participants, approximately two-thirds were white. so if anyone was going to do too much talking and not enough listening, the anarcho-crackers in attendance had a two-in-three chance of being the culprit. also, it was a rather hastily organized meeting, and attempts were made to smooth out and equalize the discussion as much as possible in the time allowed given the numbers involved. on the other hand, thanks for pointing out the disparity.

yesterday i saw people organizing without leading, opening up possibilities for others without preaching, and a disparate crowd learning to move forcefully and with coordation--even though noone was instructing them. this is what everything i've read says is behind successful anarchist organizing and action, but this is first time i've seen it in the flesh.

thank you to everyone who was there (all ~700k of you!) for a brilliant may day.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

thanks for the good reportback Jay Pee

this comment posted by Jevon/Jevacula
 

Anarchists were insignificant

I was near the front of the march, so I arrived at Grant Park early on. For the next couple of hours, I passed out flyers to all of the arriving waving of protestors. Now, I'm not saying that any Leftist group had a great impact, but the Anarchists did not do anything. As always, they formed their own secretarian block, removed from the rest of the people. To everyone outside the block, they barely noticed. People didn't even look when they passed, and the majority of the immigrants, even those right along the street when the anarchists passed, probably were not even aware of their presence. I am glad you guys had fun, but this May Day showed once again how removed you all are from the common people.
 

Re: Anarchists were insignificant

I disagree in part with you. Anarchist did provide a food not bombs serving. Anarchist also served as street medics on the march making shure attendances were o.k. Take in mind there were 400,000 folks.
Other anarchist collectives took time to talk with marchers and distributed over 3,000 pamphlets, leaflets on mayday, an anarchist stance on immigration, magon, and other information. All information was free. No attempt was made to bring people into anarchism, because it is a free choice, and outside of NEWSPAPER SELLING, and selling red flags.
I do believe in the event of any action taken by police towards marchers, or racist confronting demonstrators the anarchist would have been the ONLY left group to respond.

of course that is direct action, selling merchandise is building strength for facist parties.

I do believe an anarchist bloc wasn't needed, but there was an anarchist presence which shows solidarity, support, and a continuation of anarchist role in liberation that we all celebrated in. Mayday the emancipation of working class.
 

Re: Anarchists were insignificant

As an anarchist who did not participate in the "anarchist bloc," I have to say that from what I saw it was a good showing. Initially, I thought an anarchist bloc would be unnecssary and potentially counter-productive, so I decided to show solidarity in another capacity. At one point, I watched the march for about an hour and saw countless blocs, organizations and a mass of unaffiliated people march by. The anarchist bloc had as strong an energy as any other part of the march that I saw. I saw them stop and charge forward like Jay Pee mentioned and it was appreciated by all people watching and it fit the general feel of the march. It was certainly not my experience that it went unnoticed.

I agree that we anarchists usually do go unnoticed or we only get noticed by acting obnoxious and pissing people off. That was not the case with this march and I'm proud of us for that.

Prior to the march, there were a number of problems I thought might occur as a result of the bloc. However, from what I saw, not only did the bloc not cause these problems, but it was a great addition to the march. It was fun, it was appreciated and it was great to see some anarchists representing in the sea of American flags. (Note: I recognize the strategic choice of the organizers to encourage people to fly U.S. flags and I'm not criticizing it or defending it. I'm just saying it's nice to see some red and black among the stars and stripes.)

To sum up: I think RadicalLeftist is inaccurate and unfair in his/her criticism of the bloc. As much as some of your general criticisms about our typical actions may be true, they aren't true about this particular bloc. And this is coming from someone who wasn't part of the bloc.
 

Re: Anarchists were insignificant

As an anarchist who did not participate in the "anarchist bloc," I have to say that from what I saw it was a good showing. Initially, I thought an anarchist bloc would be unnecssary and potentially counter-productive, so I decided to show solidarity in another capacity. At one point, I watched the march for about an hour and saw countless blocs, organizations and a mass of unaffiliated people march by. The anarchist bloc had as strong an energy as any other part of the march that I saw. I saw them stop and charge forward like Jay Pee mentioned and it was appreciated by all people watching and it fit the general feel of the march. It was certainly not my experience that it went unnoticed.

I agree that we anarchists usually do go unnoticed or we only get noticed by acting obnoxious and pissing people off. That was not the case with this march and I'm proud of us for that.

Prior to the march, there were a number of problems I thought might occur as a result of the bloc. However, from what I saw, not only did the bloc not cause these problems, but it was a great addition to the march. It was fun, it was appreciated and it was great to see some anarchists representing in the sea of American flags. (Note: I recognize the strategic choice of the organizers to encourage people to fly U.S. flags and I'm not criticizing it or defending it. I'm just saying it's nice to see some red and black among the stars and stripes.)

To sum up: I think RadicalLeftist is inaccurate and unfair in his/her criticism of the bloc. As much as some of your general criticisms about our typical actions may be true, they aren't true about this particular bloc. And this is coming from someone who wasn't part of the bloc.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

selling them! 1$ a flag!
Wow this is a great account. It looks like the anarchists SAVED THE DAY by tearing through that yellow tape
"thousands of people crossing over the tape and the medians behind us! People who had been marching relatively unenergetically for an half our or an hour enthusiastiacly joined us in pulling down tape and chanting, "Si Se Puede!""
because you were climbing statues, and could've gotten hurt?
"This infuriated the 15 or 20 or so cops there, who assaulted the statue and forced everybody down. While the whole crowd of 200 or so Labor folk watched (and did little or nothing) the rest of the anarchists came over to help their friends."
woo hoo!

"When the occasional unmarked car did come by us flashing its lights we either went around or jumped quickly back to the sidewalks."
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

I have to disagree with your either uninformed or spiteful review on the march. IT was a great time. The cops were basically just playingthe same power games they always do by blockngi off certian streets and certain lanes and when the anarchists took the intiative to tell the cops to go fuck themselves the majority of the march appreciated it. It was liberating to have the power to tell the cops to go fuck themselves and to unarrest people they tried to grab and beat.

I agree we had a good level of militancy but it would have been better if we had more chants and propoganda like our own flags. That's more of a problem of white anarchists like myself not knowing spanish. There wasn't too much coordination but it turned out fine anyway. Next mayday we could definetely improve any coordination issues by having a general meeting or two, or talkgin about it at the anarchist conference next year.

The labor rally at the end was ridiculous from any political perspective. It was clearly a fault of the bureaucratic decision making process that can't adapt to change to wait until the 700,000 proles had done marching to have the labor rally. That was totally idiotic to have all of the leading labor heads to speak to a few hundred labor officers when they could have had it during the march while people were walking by or at Grant park with waves upon waves of proels to talk to. It was obvious they could have told the cops to fuck off and let the anarchists dance our own memorial but like usual the bureaucratic douchebags were more interested in listening to their own canned speeches.

The speeches were boring and uninspiring, very typical of today's labor movement. Anarchists had to go unarrest themselves from the asshole cops who went on another power trip kicking people off the statute just because they could.
 

Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

i'm not uninformed, or spiteful. i'm just disappointed with a few things that i saw and have personal ties with. the day itself was very inspirational and uplifting. i've been more active lately, then i have been in the past 2 years.

how do you feel about the anarchist movement in the united states, being boring and uninspiring?

how about the athens, response to condeleeza rice? why cant we have that type of militancy in our "own" marches today? instead of rushing onto the sidewalk whenever a cop rolls by...::i wish this site had funny smileys::::

other than that, i'm sorry that the gentrifying-mostly white-victimized-"anarchists" didn't get to climb the statue.
 
Reply: Re: Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006 / 03 May 2006
Reply: Re: Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006 / 03 May 2006
Reply: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006 / 03 May 2006
Reply: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006 / 04 May 2006

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

On May Day 2006 the Chicago Police Dept lost!

We won a street battle against control freaks who cant stand to lose. During the march anarchists and other protesters got away with things they would normally be arrested and locked up for. The cops who were there tried their hardest to arrest us but everyone who they tried to arrest was physically de-arrested. Most of the Latino protesters liked what they saw and joined us in taking over Randolph Street. So at the Haymarket rally the extremely vengeful CPD tried to arrest each anarchist they saw but they were stopped by our direct action. After that the sore losers of the violent CPD went home.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

What exactly is the point of "dressing" as a black bloc? The black bloc is a mostly obsolete tactical strategy for extremely confrontational street fighting. I'm always amused and befuddled by "black blocs" that are completely out of context at peaceful, non-riotous assemblies. Can someone explain this to me?

I appreciate a visible anarchist presence everywhere, and especially at demonstrations that challenge the state. I was happy to see black anarchist and red and black syndicalist flags in the streets on Mayday.

But "blocking" (so to speak) seems to serve more to identify potential "troublemakers" to the cops and alienate anarchist youth from everybody else. The original anarchists wore suits, for crying out loud.

Of course, maybe it's just about being alienated youth and I'm too old or something...
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

maybe we should all just be cool and wear zoot suits?



im down for that.
 

Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

I already do that EVERYDAY. Fear my fedora.
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

some people dress in drag and go to cabarets; some people dress in chaps and spurs and go to dude ranches; some people dress in lycra and spandex and ride their bikes real fast.

me, i wear a bandana and go to protests.

and if someone(s) out there have an effective or outrageous action in mind, well, i hope to hell they wear suits. that way, while the cops are giving me the hairy eye-ball, they slip past unnoticed.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Alright.

It's time something serious was brought up.

Why do we continue to let security risks, rapists, and domestic abusers into our community? On the march, I saw all three of these. I'm not mentioning any names, but we all know who I'm talking about. All three were there, and they're all friends! Should we really be letting them march with us? They obviously have a different set of ideals. There's a reason we don't march with the RCP. We shouldn't march with rapists, domestic abusers, or "snitches".
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Why do we continue to let security risks, rapists, and domestic abusers into our community? On the march, I saw all three of these. I'm not mentioning any names, but we all know who I'm talking about. All three were there, and they're all friends! Should we really be letting them march with us? They obviously have a different set of ideals. There's a reason we don't march with the RCP. We shouldn't march with rapists, domestic abusers, or "snitches".

You could have said something during the march.

 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

how about instead of using the internet to deal with issues such as these, you speak DIRECTLY to the people involved? or are we gonna have another shit-talking drama session just like last fall?
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

i agree with you.

its hard to speak up, when you think of something in your head. you feel kinda alone to bring it up. it's hard but, i'm on the same page with you.

and i know some of who you are talking about.

i'm all on with you on that.

fuck that "good job bringing it up on the internet" do we all actually know eachother, some yes, some no. okay? the internet is a tool of communication. and this is just a thought. maybe this person did bring it up in person. who knows.
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

If people continue to be a threat, then say something or do something to those involved or affected directly. step back and look to see if the issue or individuals in question contiinue to be a problem or an asset, and act accordingly. on the other hand, some people being overzealous or paranoid need to seriously consider whether their efforts end up being productive for the greater good, or whether they are creating more unnecessary divisions. the march on the 1st was great and I hope people appreciate how much we got accomplished that day because we marched together.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

so will you be standing and telling people who can march and who can't? and rcp was there and guess what you marched with them too.
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

the rcp also bailed an anarchist of jail. remember that?
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

"It's time something serious was brought up."

oh yeah cause internet postings are really the way to deal with something serious, as has been so successful in the past...

at this point i feel anyone trying to bring this stuff up on the internet is a troll whose learned exactly what buttons to push. now we all hate each other for things we may or may not have said. good work.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

there are a few inaccuracies, to say the least, in the claims made about the people being referred to as "rapist", "domestic abuser", and "snitch"/"security risk".

if people want to know what is going on, and if they know the people involved, then the best way to do so is to speak face to face, or to directly contact the people involved in some other way. (you know - DIRECT ACTION)... of course it's difficult, and of course people don't want to do it, but you know, it really is the best thing to do.

putting it on the internet isn't necessarily wrong or anything, but it's ultimately not going to help the problem in the long run.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

the person you call "rapist" is actually working on several things to deal with his shit, and he is keeping in touch with the survivor - if you folks want to talk to her, you can easily get her info from the people you know.

the person you call "domestic abuser" is not, as far as can be seen, doing anything to deal with his shit.

those two people are NOT friends anymore. one is busy putting his fucked-up life back together, and the other stubbornly refuses to acknowledge any of his abusive behavior.

any more questions? send an email to thecorpse at riseup dot net. no spam or hate, please.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

After I constantly hear shit talk from the @ community about the RCP, paper sellers, and "Rapist and security risks".

WTF, if you think someone is a security risk don't isolate them so their only friends are the feds. Don't organise with someone you have a deep emotional problem with.

And for godsakes don't take any money from the RCp, cuz they get lotsa cash from liberals.

Yeah, it's been a few days you can rush an envelope over to Chairman Bob right now stuffed with twenties, and thankfully you won't have taken money from liberal commies.

Do you wonder why the RCP isn't organizing with you guys yet?

Maybe the bad mouthing and juvenile antics have finally gotten to Bob HQ and they decided to do their best at organizing a fair honest movement that doesn't bad mouth others views and even ponies up the bail money even when someone doesn't agree with them politically.

Maybe you should take a lesson from Bob.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Oh hell yes, doth my eyes devieve me?!
Anarchists discussing loaded and extremely serious issues in a calm respectful and measured way?!
Keep it up and we may yet be a threat again!

cointelpro 0

rational discussion 1

take that evil doers!
 

stereotypes!

The anarchist bloc was cool, but it was kinda typical. Most of the people involved looked like your usual angry punk-rock teenager with crazy colored hair and patches & safety pins on their torn-up clothes. There were a few people marching with the anarchists who didn't fit that stereotype, though, and i think that a lot more people who identify as anarchist or anarchist-friendly who also don't fit the stereotype would have come out if they just get over their middle-class brainwashed prejudice against angry punkrock kids.
 

what's really sad...

What's really sad and pathetic is that there are so many people in Rat Patrol, which claims to be an "anarchist" group, who are totally OK with having this domestic-abuser-in-denial guy be a part of the group. THAT is FUCKED UP.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Wow, way to prove me wrong.

"middle-class brainwashed prejudice against angry punkrock kids"

Punks have done some good for the anarchist movement, punks have done some bad for the movement. Let there be a honest assesment of the two and move the fuck on. Calling any critisism of what some people see to be the pitfalls of a punk dominated appearance as "middle class" is just plain weak. I would expound upon this particular arguement, but like I said, I'm inspired by the recent tone of anarchos in CHI and I'll lay off my own usual saectarian attack for once!! Maybe It'll start a trend.

"What's really sad and pathetic is that there are so many people in Rat Patrol, which claims to be an "anarchist" group, who are totally OK with having this domestic-abuser-in-denial guy be a part of the group. THAT is FUCKED UP."

Thanks for bringing this to mine, and everyone elses attention. Like a good number of people on this board, I imagine, I don't know this alleged abuser, don't have any dealing with his (I assume he) group, and most importantly I COULDN'T FUCKING CARE LESS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If it's such a pressing issue then fucking do something about it in THE REAL WORLD!
Like someone above mentioned, how much luck did we have with last years little internet drama fest?
If anyone has any specific requests for aide, assistance, mediations, beat downs etc, then speak the fuck up and people will step up in such a way as the facts that they hear first hand compell them .

But for fucks sake already, shut the fuck up with the e-drama, wanna-be cointelpro, too cowardly to do something in real life internet bullshit.
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

people HAVE been trying to do things in the real world since at least last October. what keeps this shit going is not their failure to address the issue in person - it's the abuser's denial, his violence, his manipulative behavior, and the COMPLACENCY of his friends and others in the community.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

The Rat Patrol is not an anarchist group, but there are a lot of anarchists in it.

We have been trying to deal with this problem for months. We've confronted him face-to-face too. He's a stubborn ass who won't deal with his problems or go away. It also doesn't help that one of the other Rat Patrol members, a self-proclaimed "conservative liberal" (ugh...) wants to continue working with him and keeps inviting this guy to events, even after we tell him not to.

My point is that this is an issue we're trying to deal with right now, so please stop bringing the Rat Patrol up. We're an apolitic organization.
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

the issue is that if one patriarchal abuser-in-denial guy is gonna be allowed to organize with local anarchists and fly the black flag at a protest, then anyone else is welcome. chicago anarchists will quickly lose credibility. it's not enough just to keep abusive people like that out - it's up to those abusive people to take it upon themselves to own up to their abuse and change themselves.

by the way, the <a href="http://rat-patrol.org/Manifesto2.html" target=top>rat patrol manifesto</a> makes the reference to being an anarchist group... but then again, they might have been being totally sarcastic about it.

even so, it doesn't matter if you're anarchist or not. abuse is abuse is abuse. patriarchy is patriarchy is patriarchy. everywhere.

people who go around calling themselves "conservative liberals" deserve nothing but a kick in the groin. fuck them. they are only there to stab you in the back and suck sexist dick.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

People are still pissed, that’s why they’re still talking about it….

I don’t know how I feel about people bringing this shit up on the internet. I agree it would be better to deal with things in “real life” but things aren’t happening there either. In “real” life you can make up situations and conversations. but at least here, you can all read it and verify what was said. I don’t even know how to contact the people involved in the situation. Since I’m in florida, I don’t really know who’s letting who work with them and honestly I’ve been trying to not think about. I’m not going to dictate to a scene I am no longer apart of, from across the country, who they should allow in their groups up there. I will not work with anyone who is a rapist so it looks like that might be an issue when I move back to the Chicagoland area this summer.

If it weren’t for these indymedia boards I wouldn’t have a voice at all. The last time I posted was in response to a message sent over the ARA listserv where my story was twisted and misportrayed. I was the opinion of the author that it was a case of “regretting it after the fact”. I was furious at the time. I learned that if I’m going to wait for justice (even just a little) to let go of what happened to me, then I would never get over it. Over the following months I’ve pretty much settled for the fact that everyone knows how I feel about the situation and went on with my life again. Sometimes I feel like it’s more painful to hear about everybody’s fucked up defenses for him then to just let it go knowing that he has made absolutely no effort what so ever to right his wrong.

He has made an effort to clear his name though. This is what has brought this whole mess to my attention again. *Somehow a rumor was started that I had accused somebody, one of my best friends, to forcefully coming onto me. This never happened. Never happened, never said it happened. You would think that if you were going to accuse one friend of harassing another you would at least get the story from the victim. On the contrary I only found out about this accusation, that was in my name, last month.

Meanwhile, my rapist contacted my former friend, (who wasn’t talking to me for about a year and a half because he thought I accused him of being a rapist). I’m guessing he was using him as a reference for me being somebody who “cries rape”. I didn’t know any of this was going on and maybe that was the point. I would’ve never found out but I finally went to visit my friend and was like “why the fuck are you mad at me?”. I was totally caught off guard. I couldn’t believe that this had all happened and that I had no idea about it. I couldn’t believe that my dearest friends was being accused of assaulting me and that the person who actually did rape me was contacting him as a reference.

This was just as I was kinda getting used to letting all this shit go. But I can’t let this go. I have tried so hard to not be confrontational, for my own sanity mostly. It was painful to have nothing happen, now I feel like I’m being attacked. I lost a really good friend for a year and half due to somebody’s attempt to discredit me through rumors and lies. The only thing that’s worse how I feel about my poor friend, who previously had absolutely nothing to do with the situation, had to take the heat of being accused of something so terrible, and so completely out of his character. I am used to dealing with all this shit by now but to drag innocent people into it for your own gain is fucked.

It’s fucked up. It’s so beyond fucked up that I can still hardly believe it. But all I know is I can’t take it anymore. I’m moving up there and I’m going to make sure that there is a point of process for when this kinda shit happens. Obviously, this situation is completely fucked. If there’s one thing we can all agree on is that THIS didn’t work. Judging all that’s happened since last fall, I don’t see it ever being resolved. If what’s his futs is working with the survivor and working on his personal shit than that is awesome. I’ve had no such satisfaction and I want to make sure that when this happens again, I know it will and maybe even has since then, people don’t feel the way I do. I think that if you make it everybody’s business then of course somebody’s not going to fess up to raping somebody else. If this can be dealt with in a more organized manor than maybe we can actually help people instead of making it worse. If nobody else is going to do it then I am and two and a half years of bottled rage has to be good for something.

I’ve missed you all.
I can’t wait to come home.
Kate
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

People are still pissed, that’s why they’re still talking about it….

I don’t know how I feel about people bringing this shit up on the internet. I agree it would be better to deal with things in “real life” but things aren’t happening there either. In “real” life you can make up situations and conversations. but at least here, you can all read it and verify what was said. I don’t even know how to contact the people involved in the situation. Since I’m in florida, I don’t really know who’s letting who work with them and honestly I’ve been trying to not think about. I’m not going to dictate to a scene I am no longer apart of, from across the country, who they should allow in their groups up there. I will not work with anyone who is a rapist so it looks like that might be an issue when I move back to the Chicagoland area this summer.

If it weren’t for these indymedia boards I wouldn’t have a voice at all. The last time I posted was in response to a message sent over the ARA listserv where my story was twisted and misportrayed. I was the opinion of the author that it was a case of “regretting it after the fact”. I was furious at the time. I learned that if I’m going to wait for justice (even just a little) to let go of what happened to me, then I would never get over it. Over the following months I’ve pretty much settled for the fact that everyone knows how I feel about the situation and went on with my life again. Sometimes I feel like it’s more painful to hear about everybody’s fucked up defenses for him then to just let it go knowing that he has made absolutely no effort what so ever to right his wrong.

He has made an effort to clear his name though. This is what has brought this whole mess to my attention again. *Somehow a rumor was started that I had accused somebody, one of my best friends, to forcefully coming onto me. This never happened. Never happened, never said it happened. You would think that if you were going to accuse one friend of harassing another you would at least get the story from the victim. On the contrary I only found out about this accusation, that was in my name, last month.

Meanwhile, my rapist contacted my former friend, (who wasn’t talking to me for about a year and a half because he thought I accused him of being a rapist). I’m guessing he was using him as a reference for me being somebody who “cries rape”. I didn’t know any of this was going on and maybe that was the point. I would’ve never found out but I finally went to visit my friend and was like “why the fuck are you mad at me?”. I was totally caught off guard. I couldn’t believe that this had all happened and that I had no idea about it. I couldn’t believe that my dearest friends was being accused of assaulting me and that the person who actually did rape me was contacting him as a reference.

This was just as I was kinda getting used to letting all this shit go. But I can’t let this go. I have tried so hard to not be confrontational, for my own sanity mostly. It was painful to have nothing happen, now I feel like I’m being attacked. I lost a really good friend for a year and half due to somebody’s attempt to discredit me through rumors and lies. The only thing that’s worse how I feel about my poor friend, who previously had absolutely nothing to do with the situation, had to take the heat of being accused of something so terrible, and so completely out of his character. I am used to dealing with all this shit by now but to drag innocent people into it for your own gain is fucked.

It’s fucked up. It’s so beyond fucked up that I can still hardly believe it. But all I know is I can’t take it anymore. I’m moving up there and I’m going to make sure that there is a point of process for when this kinda shit happens. Obviously, this situation is completely fucked. If there’s one thing we can all agree on is that THIS didn’t work. Judging all that’s happened since last fall, I don’t see it ever being resolved. If what’s his futs is working with the survivor and working on his personal shit than that is awesome. I’ve had no such satisfaction and I want to make sure that when this happens again, I know it will and maybe even has since then, people don’t feel the way I do. I think that if you make it everybody’s business then of course somebody’s not going to fess up to raping somebody else. If this can be dealt with in a more organized manor than maybe we can actually help people instead of making it worse. If nobody else is going to do it then I am and two and a half years of bottled rage has to be good for something.

I’ve missed you all.
I can’t wait to come home.
Kate
 

Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

I was told after the fact that Sear had shown up at the antifascist demo in Logan Square on May 4th. I was there too but since no one pointed out to me who he was, the vast majority of people at this demo didnt know who Sear was or what he looked like, I didnt recognize him.

Someone needs to post a photo of Sear on Chicago Indymedia or at least distribute photos of him through the activist community so we all can recognize him the next time he shows up at a protest or gathering.
 

Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

Did anyone read my suggestion?
 

Re: Re: Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

People need to stop encouraging bad security practices on the internet.

This situation needs to be dealt with in person, with the parties involved and their close friends. Posting pictures and spreading rumors and arguing on the internet isn't going to get anything done.

If the last year isn't evidence of that, I don't know what is.
 

Re: Account of the Anarchist Bloc at Chicago Mayday/Immigrant's Rights march, 2006

comments on the anarchist bloc at chicago mayday actions

The anarchist bloc was invited to join the labor unions in the front of the May 1st march. They should have just showed up there, since that's the only sensible place for them. Remember the events that led up to International Workers Day? Remember the alliances anarchists have had with the working class movement around the globe for over a century? They didn't need to be invited, since it was assumed they would be there. But even when they were invited, they declined the welcoming gesture, thus making themselves irrelevant. The fact that they were in Chicago when they decided not to march in an appropriate position made them look even more ridiculous. Why bring red and black flags, or bucket drums, or anything if they're not joining with workers' associations? What does solidarity mean? It obviously meant nothing to the anarchist bloc.

I thought we were all on the same page about the May 1st rally. Don't do anything illegal or violent since there was too much danger of inadvertantly drawing "illegal aliens" into entanglements with the System. There was also a danger that the bourgeois press could focus on confrontation tactics as a way of detracting public attention away from the positive message that this new rebellious mass movement is putting out. Anything that provoked the police would backfire on us, be divisive, alienate us from our allies, help the global ruling class to further obstruct the industrial working class from advancing a socialist revolution, etc.

I marched with the IWW, but when they left Grant Park to go over to the 4:30 labor rally, I told them I'd meet up with them over there. I walked with the anarchists to the Haymarket statue. Some of the IWW members are anarchists though our primary function is to promote industrial unionism, not anarcho-syndicalism. If the anarchists had formed affinity groups, people probably would not have been climbing on the statue. Or even if they had, the tension created by such folly would have been reduced much faster. But if you have an undifferentiated mass of anarchists marching together in an unorganized manner, it's very easy for false collective consciousness to develop. A few anti-social, self-destructive people can easily take control of a disorganized situation, and manipulate people to further their agenda of compulsive disruption, without any accountability. What could motivate someone to climb up on a statue, given the circumstances we were faced with in that time/space? A compulsion to do something that was counter-revolutionary? Poor impulse control? An inability to stop reacting to symptoms, and dig deeper to find the root causes of conflicts? This is all idle speculation, and I don't have a clue why these people would have acted in such a reactionary way. I'm sure they weren't unercover police agents, because I've got a sixth sense about that stuff. But they obviously had a low level of class consciousness.

Climbing on a statue in that particular situation was an empty gesture that put undocumented workers at risk, and alienated IWW members from other labor union organizers, because they associated us with the anarchists. When the anarchists marched into the labor rally it was appreciated as a gesture of solidarity. But when they rudely disrupted the rally, the good will was negated. If we can't even be polite with each other, how will we work together for a common cause?

If you are not involved in struggling for workers' control at the job site (field, mine, mill, office, factory, etc), or community control in working class neighborhoods, then your involvement in mass protest actions are merely symbolic. If you maintain a militant stance in the abstract, you're left with empty masculist (machismo) posturing. If you don't have a philosophical, historical, or spiritual sense of what it means to be a council communist, anti-state communist, anarchist, nihilist, situationist, or whatever, then you need to slow down. If we are serious about direct representation / direct participation, then we need to get organized in a locally-based decentralized way. We can get things done without centralized bureaucracy and hierarchy.

Take some time to develop a theory of liberation, and find some balance between theory and practice. We don't have time to babysit for bubble-gum, teeny-boppers who act like privileged brats. You have to do it yourself(DIY). We're a valuable resource, and you should feel free to ask us for help, but we're not going to bail you out when you mess up. Everyone has to accept the consequences for what they do or don't do. We are your comrades, not your surragate parents. if you aren't struggling to be more self-sufficient, and more self-reliant, then nobody will take you seriously when you talk about autonomy, authoritarianism, exploitation, oppression, etc.

There are at least a dozen theories of liberation, and they are all historically linked to peasants and workers engaging in class struggle against industrial capitalism. The last stage of patriarchy is capitalism. The last stage of capitalism is imperialism. The last stage of imperialism is neo-colonialism. None of these liberation struggles are seperated from each other, and anyone who succeeds in some grass-roots organizing efforts for positive social change will support all the other efforts to smash the global empire.

If you think you can infiltrate us to get an easy piece of ass, you're deluding yourself. If you try to exploit differences among us around issues of ecological harmony, gender identity, sexual preference, class struggle, racialism, national oppression, or anything so that you can get laid, your grandousity will overwhelm you. The best case scenario will be that one of us will have sex with you despite your obvious ignorance. Maybe it's not about raging hormones, but merely a desire to socialize with us because we seem interesting. Get into a collective or an affinity group. Learn some history, theory, etc. Take some initiative. Jump in. The only dumb question is the one you don't ask. Being hip and underground has nothing to do with what we're involved in. We're not cool, so if you're looking for a hardcore scene, we're not it. Most anarchists are not punk rockers. Most punks are not anarchists. If you can't relate to these roots of class liberation, then you're a wanker and you should piss off. Trendy posers are not welcome here. We are not a fad or a trend, so don't waste your time associating with us. If you are not down with revolution, why are you hanging out with us?
 

出会い

出会い出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無料系サイト優良出会い系攻略完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダルトサイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海外。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻SMコレクション風俗告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメエロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチアニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画カーセックスセックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセックス体位東京セックス仕方SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板おっぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳掲示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫
 
Donate

Views

Account Login

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software