Immigration and May Day
Chicago is the birth place of 'May Day', but today's march demonstrated a disconnect between the current low paid workers demanding recognition within the system, and what we have grown globally to understand May Day as celebrating.









Chicago - home of the original May Day. Although the 1st of May is not a holiday in the US, thousands of workers and school students walked out today to take part in a huge pro-immigration march across the city. 120 years ago immigrant workers speaking a mixture of European languages struck to demand a 8 hour day. Today workers from another continent are coming together to demand that they be treated as equal citizens to the descendants of those who won that right.
The events in Chicago and across the US are in response to the proposed H.R. 4437 legislation - also known as “The Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act of 2005” - which would, among other things, make illegal immigration a felony punishable by much higher fines, and build a 700 mile long fence along the US-Mexico border. The issue of immigration in the US is reaching a climax with this propose legislation and its huge nation wide response. However, like many problems in the US, it cannot be seen out of the context of race. Chicago is one of the most diverse and segregated cities in North America and besides its Hispanic, Black and Irish communities has the largest population of Swedes, Assyrians, Serbs, Lithuanians and Poles outside of their 'home' countries, and the third largest Greek population outside of Greece. Those working with illegal immigrants claim that there are, for instance, far more Polish illegal immigrants in Chicago than Hispanics, suggesting that the intense focus in the US on Latin American 'illegals' rather than Europeans is motivated more by pure racism than many would care to admit.
The march this afternoon perhaps reflected this focus on the issue as only one for Latin American's. The vast majority of those marching were Hispanic, and although these marches have been some of the biggest the US has seen since the Vietnam war, the movement was almost entirely focused on this one issue. A small black bloc were allegedly in existence, from the information circulating email lists beforehand, and a few of the usual newspaper selling Trots were scattered about, but this movement seems to have taken the radical community just a little bit by surprise. News of the first big marches on the 10th of March came after the events, and the involvement of the non-Hispanic radicals in the organisation of today's actions have been fairly minimal.
No samba bands. No puppets. No sound systems. No unions. No riot police. The event attracted people of all ages, but only one background. This was not even like the 2003 anti-war marches, that brought out people who otherwise would never march. Thousands came out who probably have never marched before, but they were not joined by the usual suspects we expect to see on May Day.
120 years later a mass movement is taking up the original call of May Day, but it feels like there is a disconnect to the celebrations and actions taking part in the rest of the world. Rather than wanting to fight the system, this immigrant movement is calling for inclusion in it. The mostly handmade signs being carried through the streets of Chicago were calling for recognition of the work of immigrants, that this is a country of foreigners, that we are all Americans, that we pay taxes and contribute too. The slogans being shouted were as often “U! S! A!” as “Si, Se Puede!”, and the flags were national - the Mexican and the Stars and Stripes - rather than black or red. I expected before I arrived to hear people calling out “No Borders”, but that wasn't the aim.
Another generation of immigrants wants to be let in, and some of the current “Americans” don't want to make room. But this is an old fight and one that will always resurge while the issue remains inclusion within borders, rather than a dismantling of them.
Comments
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
what's in it for us to discount the focus on latino immigrants' rights? they did the work and brought out the hundreds of thousands. instead, let's do like was done today: come out in true solidarity, demostrate our will and ability to support their struggles, and maybe--just maybe--form relationships of mutual respect and mutual aid. once we've established those relationships predicated on mutual aid, we can start talking about broadening the analysis.
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Did anyone notice?
01 May 2006
Why were they there? Did the moribund Illinois Labor History club fear that real working people might destroy the momument with its confused message?
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
There were several bands, plenty of unions, a number of sound systems (some in the hands of some far-out folks) and the riot police were there, if tucked away a bit.
And there were all kinds of flags --red, red-and-black, Mexican, Polish, Irish, Greek, and Old Glory, most of all. The national flags far outnumbered the political. But people carried the ones they liked -- would you have it otherwise?
As for the American flag, put it in context here. What was the message? I think they were saying, by carrying these flags, 'Americans, you have fine ideals. Now let's live up to them and repudiate those xenophobes who are trying to drag them in the mud!' Do you think I'm off base here? If so, ask a few of the immigrant workers who carried it.
And people from every left group in the city were there, too, well prepared with leaflets and newspapers. It's just that among 400,000 plus, they were more diluted than usual.
I guess I'm trying to figure out your main point here.
If you think that demanding to be included in our country with dignity and equality is too tame or pro-system, then you're dead wrong. Remember, it's the 'system' that been treating them without dignity and with inequality.
May Day is a perfect day to focus on immigrant rights, especially with 400,000 workers saying 'Yes, it can be done!' It was the best Chicago May day ever, in my lifetime anyway.
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
The second march to Haymarket Square went well, and congrats to all those who got together to work out a route. I think the similarities between the today and the first Haymarket riots were surreal, especially with the band playing in the background. The harshness of the cops and the force they tookout on innocent bystanders as well as young kids trying to reclaim THEIR monument was horrific. Glad no one got arrested.
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Almost all of the "no's" you listed weren't true. I saw a samba band, a number of large puppets, and a BUNCH of unions.
Also our contingent from Woodlawn was mostly African-American, and although it is certainly true that the efforts of the powerful to divide black and brown communities have had some effect, there are also many in both communities who believe in uniting to demand the whole pie (living wage jobs, full employment, etc.) instead of fighting for the crumbs (who gets access to low-wage jobs).
Most importantly, though, this article drastically mis-interprets the meaning of cries for inclusion and the use of american flags. The use of the flag is strategic, a deliberate attempt to counter the right-wing media's portrayal of this issue. Strategic symbolism should not be conflated with an ideological statement, and as much as we as revolutionaries of all creeds would love to see an overt rejection of all nations and borders from the get-go, there is also a day-to-day struggle for survival and basic human dignity and respect that should not be discounted as reformist. the bottom line is that people are coming into the streets and seeing their own power, already we have beat back Sensennbrenner, and now people are talking about extending demands to include labor rights, etc. Just like Huey Newton wrote in his memoirs, you don't get from A to Z without passing C, D, and E. let us not forget that the original May Day took place during a struggle for the 8 hour day. 8 hours of being exploited is better than 10, 12 or 16 but certainly not the same as being free from wage labor and exploitation period. yet those who were murdered subsequently for their involvement or association with the organizing that led to that march were all avowedly revolutionary, some anarchist, some socialist. they recognized then, and we need to recognize now, that an action isn't reformist or revolutionary based on its immediate demands, but rather based on its long-term potential to demonstrate to everyday people their own potential power and encourage them to wield that power in broader and broader ways.
what is revolutionary about the immigrants rights movement has nothing to do with what flags are being carried, it has to do with the numbers of people who have never been politically active who are beginning to think of themselves as part of a community with power. a little taste of power can go a long way and swell the ranks of all of our organizations, but only if we are able to get over the idea that our only allies are those who are willing from the get-go to call for a borderless, classless society. our allies are our brothers and sisters fighting for their dignity, not just the people who understand that long term borders are just a tool of the bosses and politicians to keep our communities divided and their labor pool cheap. never forget Paulo Freire's reminder to start where people are at, not where you want them to be.
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
Almost all of the "no's" you listed weren't true. I saw a samba band, a number of large puppets, and a BUNCH of unions.
Also our contingent from Woodlawn was mostly African-American, and although it is certainly true that the efforts of the powerful to divide black and brown communities have had some effect, there are also many in both communities who believe in uniting to demand the whole pie (living wage jobs, full employment, etc.) instead of fighting for the crumbs (who gets access to low-wage jobs).
Most importantly, though, this article drastically mis-interprets the meaning of cries for inclusion and the use of american flags. The use of the flag is strategic, a deliberate attempt to counter the right-wing media's portrayal of this issue. Strategic symbolism should not be conflated with an ideological statement, and as much as we as revolutionaries of all creeds would love to see an overt rejection of all nations and borders from the get-go, there is also a day-to-day struggle for survival and basic human dignity and respect that should not be discounted as reformist. the bottom line is that people are coming into the streets and seeing their own power, already we have beat back Sensennbrenner, and now people are talking about extending demands to include labor rights, etc. Just like Huey Newton wrote in his memoirs, you don't get from A to Z without passing C, D, and E. let us not forget that the original May Day took place during a struggle for the 8 hour day. 8 hours of being exploited is better than 10, 12 or 16 but certainly not the same as being free from wage labor and exploitation period. yet those who were murdered subsequently for their involvement or association with the organizing that led to that march were all avowedly revolutionary, some anarchist, some socialist. they recognized then, and we need to recognize now, that an action isn't reformist or revolutionary based on its immediate demands, but rather based on its long-term potential to demonstrate to everyday people their own potential power and encourage them to wield that power in broader and broader ways.
what is revolutionary about the immigrants rights movement has nothing to do with what flags are being carried, it has to do with the numbers of people who have never been politically active who are beginning to think of themselves as part of a community with power. a little taste of power can go a long way and swell the ranks of all of our organizations, but only if we are able to get over the idea that our only allies are those who are willing from the get-go to call for a borderless, classless society. our allies are our brothers and sisters fighting for their dignity, not just the people who understand that long term borders are just a tool of the bosses and politicians to keep our communities divided and their labor pool cheap. never forget Paulo Freire's reminder to start where people are at, not where you want them to be.
Re: Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
I think I should maybe have made clear where I am coming from though. I wrote it first for UK Indymedia (www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/05/339385.html – I could put more photos up there as well) as I am interested in how different this May Day march was from those I have seen before. For instance, check out what happened today in some other places (a fairly random pick, but mostly European):
www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/04/339047.html
liege.indymedia.org/news/2006/04/6812.php
germany.indymedia.org/2006/05/145293.shtml
scotland.indymedia.org/newswire/display/2801/index.php italy.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/1060345.php
In some places, more fluffy and carnivalesque, in others more militant. But certainly different, and usually with a very strong anti-capitalism / anti-state / 'no borders, no nations' message. I am not at all trying to imply that the march in Chicago wasn't an amazing achievement and a great afternoon. I am instead interested in what thousands of people will and won't mobilise for in the US, and how the No Borders and Precarity movements are being articulated in such a different way – and by different people.
I really appreciate all the comments on here: I'm glad I got a conversation going. And I'm happy to take the criticisms - this piece is an opinion, that's all.
I think I should maybe have made clear where I am coming from though. I wrote it first for UK Indymedia (www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/05/339385.html – there are more photos there as well) as I am interested in how different this May Day march was from those I have seen before. For instance, check out what happened today in some other places (a fairly random pick):
www.indymedia.org.uk/en/2006/04/339047.html
liege.indymedia.org/news/2006/04/6812.php
germany.indymedia.org/2006/05/145293.shtml
scotland.indymedia.org/newswire/display/2801/index.php italy.indymedia.org/news/2006/05/1060345.php
In some places, more fluffy and carnivalesque, in others more militant. But certainly different, and usually with a very strong anti-capitalism / anti-state / 'no borders, no nations' message. I am not at all trying to imply that the march in Chicago wasn't an amazing achievement and a great afternoon. I am instead interested in what thousands of people will and won't mobilise for in the US, and how the No Borders and Precarity movements are being articulated in such a different way – and by different people.
And if I missed all the real action - then hey, where's your Indymedia postings showing me what I missed! Come on folks, how come this huge event has so few postings on here? Where are all the other photos and reports? Prove me wrong - show me that there really is a strong connection between the contemporary immigration movement and the more traditional flavours of radical leftist politics.
Re: Immigration and May Day
01 May 2006
出会い
25 Mar 2008