Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

Click on image for a larger version

On January 14, 2005, members of the Chicago General Membership Branch of the Industrial Workers of the World labor union (IWW) called for an informational picket to boycott the Ideal Hand Car Wash in Chicago’s Albany Park neighborhood after the managers and owners of the business refused to pay Neil Rysdahl, a longtime member of the IWW, the $227.50 he was owed for over 45 hours of work he preformed for them.
The highly visible protest began at 8 AM, with a small but dedicated group of picketers banging bucket drums, shaking noisemakers, passing out leaflets, and carrying signs reading, “Ideal Car Wash Cheats Workers,” and “An Injury to One is an Injury to All!” Notably, one picketer dressed in a clown costume held a sign reading, “Ideal Bosses Are Bozos!” to mock the clown Ideal usually uses to attract customers.
Humboldt Park Food Not Bombs showed up to serve bread, pastry, hummus, and coffee, and joined in the picket. “I knew this was an important picket to support because it was an opportunity to make a real difference in someone’s life through direct action,” said Robert Clack, a member of Humboldt Park Food Not Bombs.
The picket effectively shut down business at the car wash for the morning, as most drivers who intended to patronize Ideal drove away after talking with picketers or seeing signs blasting the business for unfair labor practices.
After only three hours of picketing, Eduardo “Eddie” Amanero, a manager of the car wash, agreed to pay Rysdahl in full, in cash, on the spot, in order to bring an end to the picket.
“The point of all this is, if you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us,” said Patrick Brenner, a members of the National Executive Board of the IWW. “We stick up for our members.”
In November, Rysdahl brought a grievance to the IWW Branch Meeting. The Grievance Committee then wrote two polite, professional letters to the managers and owner of Ideal, warning that industrial action would be the next step taken by the Union if Rysdahl was not paid in full in a timely manner.
“Eddie Amanero called us after he received the letter and said he was trying to sell the business,” said Penny Pixler, a member of the Grievance Committee of the IWW Chicago Branch. “He said he wasn’t going to pay Neil.”
During the protest, the owners and managers of the business tried to intimidate picketers, calling them “losers,” and “faggots.”
“When the owner and his goons showed up, and tried to start a confrontation, I tried to put them at ease and told them we didn’t want any trouble, we just wanted to make things right for Neil,” said Brenner. “When I went inside to negotiate for Neal and to collect payment for him, the guys the owner brought with him threatened us, saying, ‘Why are you paying this faggot his money? We’re going to fuck him up.’”
The landlord of the building Ideal occupies also stopped by the protest. He said the business is one and a half months late on their rent payments and indicated this might be the last straw for the owners of Ideal.
The Chicago Police arrived at the meeting point for picketers before anyone planning to attend the protest.
“The cops knew what was going on, probably from reading posts on Indymedia,” said Rysdahl. “I told them the owners of Ideal were gangsters, and that they were ripping off workers. The cops told me they already know about the situation.”
Although four or five police cars stayed in the vicinity for the duration of the protest, they did not leave their cars to approach picketers or to interfere with Food Not Bombs.
When asked what he was going to do with his back wages, Rysdahl said, “I’m going to catch up on some debts. And, of course, I’m going to pay all of the back dues I owe to the IWW!”
Comments
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Oops!
14 Jan 2006
And it's Neal, not Neil.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Anyone notice how no one's ever heard the owner/managers' side of the story?
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
14 Jan 2006
Victory in Chicago!
Re: Extortion pays off. It's gangsters vs. gangsters.
15 Jan 2006
That's criminal! That will encourage capitalists to sell each other businesses and deny workers the wages they have earned (minus of course the "surplus value" that is stolen by the capitalists in the /first/ place!)
I suppose you'd argue that successful mass demonstrations against racism are /also/ a form of extortion?!?
Re: Extortion pays off. It's gangsters vs. gangsters.
15 Jan 2006
That's criminal! That will encourage capitalists to sell each other businesses and deny workers the wages they have earned (minus of course the "surplus value" that is stolen by the capitalists in the /first/ place!)
I suppose you'd argue that successful mass demonstrations against racism are /also/ a form of extortion?!?
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
15 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
15 Jan 2006
We'll never really know the owners' side, but I agree that boycott and picketing is sometimes appropriate, and given the [i]known[/i] facts and the way it was resolved, maybe this was one of them. Glad Neal got what was owed to him.
Solidarity is not Thuggery
15 Jan 2006
Organizing a labor union and a picket is a right that is guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of this nation. It has nothing to do with "thuggery".
Standing up for your friends and supporting them non-violently does not make you a thug.
You're all a bunch of bullshit.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
15 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
16 Jan 2006
shit. there are several scumbags in this town who owe workers money. that makes it hard for workers to pay the people they owe.
so when someone stiffs a worker, there is always a defense for them, but we get stuck trying to pay our bills and suffering when we can't, because we got stiffed.
then some jackass wants to get on here and defend an owner.
you really can't afford to give business owners the benefit of the doubt. when that pattern gets established, you end up with people like george bush and bill clinton as president!
that's nice you guys.. it's nice to see people sticking up for each other and working collectively. let's hope it's a good omen for this town.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
16 Jan 2006
Aren't you too old for horseplay in the streets? And you might reassess your sense for fashion. You look terrible!
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
16 Jan 2006
Tell those folks to get in touch with the Chi-town wobs. They can help build a plan to fight for thier interests.
As for liberal wankers- put down your latte and get a life. Were talking about some workers rent. You think the landlord likes to hear 'i got stiffed at work, so filed in the courts... I might get your rent money in a few months'. Yeah that will work. If you call this peaceful demonstration 'thuggary' then your wack.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
17 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
17 Jan 2006
Arent you too rude? If your sphincter malfunctions causing you to shit your pants when your 70 and having to wear adult diapers that would be pretty funny.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
18 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
19 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
19 Jan 2006
There's been a lot of people in the activist community burned by this guy. Sadly there's always more people to step up and carry him along.
BTW, there's nothing in the CIMC editorial policy that legitimates hiding this post. I know, because I helped write it.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
20 Jan 2006
This story is about solidarity and direct action against a greedy employer with no scruples about ripping his employees off. Not your personal gripes about others.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
20 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
20 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
29 Jan 2006
Still, IMO, this was a pathetic story that makes CIMC look bad.
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
30 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
31 Jan 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
03 Feb 2006
Re: Direct Action Gets the Goods! IWW Chicago Victory for Unpaid Worker
26 Apr 2006