These are the only motions than were filed on behalf of Johnny
Wizard's defense on behalf of our Humanity. A man arrested for
threatening the continuing existence of the lawless demon
anti-Christ, Our Mr. bush Jnr. The demon nazi who
murdered thousands in New York City as God's enemy. I, beg
and plead my case to ALL that will listen. The tyrannies of
suffering on God happen when good people go silent in the face
of evil. Please do not forsake all that is good within yourself,
by leaving my call unheard from.


--------

AFFIDAVIT

AFFIDAVIT OF JOHNNY WIZARD


I, Johnny Wizard, in the city of Winnipeg, Province of Manitoba
MAKE OATH AND SAY:


1.

Pakistani ISI Director General Ahmad orders an aide to wire transfer about
$100,000 to
hijacker Atta. Ahmad later resigns after the transfer is disclosed in India and
confirmed
by the FBI. [Dawn, 10/8/01, Times of India, 10/9/01, Wall Street Journal,
10/10/01, AFP,
10/10/01] The individual who makes the wire transfer at Ahmad's direction is
Saeed
Sheikh, later convinced for kidnapping and murdering reporter Daniel Pearl in
February
2002. ABC News later reports, "federal authorities have told ABC News they've
now
tracked more than $100,000 from banks in Pakistan to two banks in Florida to
accounts
held by suspected hijack ringleader Mohamed Atta." [ABC News, 9/30/01] CNN also
reports the $100,000 transfer, and the New York Times specifies that it came in
2000.
[CNN, 10/1/01, CNN, 10/6/01, New York Times, 7/10/02] Ahmad's order must have
preceded June 2000, since that's when Atta and others started opening bank
accounts and
receiving the money ($109,910 is received by Atta and Marwan Alshehhi between
June
19 and September 18). [MSNBC, 12/11/01]

2.

On March 3, 2002, MSNBC's Jim Miklaszewski reported that he had received
anonymously, top secret presidential war strategy documents dated September 9th,
2001,
originating from Condolezza's office, outlining a strategy to invade Afghanistan
premised
on blaming bin Laden a terrorist, but providing no evidence to back up the
allegations,
thereby guaranteeing criminal invasion. Only workable if Laden pleads innocence
to a
crime that hadn't yet taken place, a crime serious enough to "justify"
sacrificing American
GIs truly for a liquefied natural gas pipe line for pension thieving Enron.
["The Dahbol
Working Group" and Bridas] Any evidence for any offense would have been
sufficient to
have Muslim fundamentalists hand Laden immediately over, as they had offered [as
others
of other nations had also] repeatedly during the Clinton years.

CBC and CNN have still, to this day, consciously refused to do any follow up on
the
intelligence, deciding instead on behalf of dying people everywhere, our public
devolvement of a just society.

3.

RTÉ News - US rejects Taliban bin Laden evidence calls
21 September 2001 17:41

The White House has rejected requests from Afghanistan's ruling Taliban for
proof that
Osama bin Laden was responsible for last week's attacks. According to the US
Secretary
of State, Colin Powell, the United States has enough evidence to try bin Laden
in an
American court.

The US Government said there would be no negotiations.

4.

[This following document was the official damning account]

Responsibility for the terrorist atrocities in the United States
4 October 2001
www.pm.gov.uk/output/page3554.asp

[This Internet Domain is Britain's Prime Minister's]

"This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Usama Bin
Laden
in a court of law."

The document doesn’t hold ANY case, as that was the strategy.... See?

5.

Investigating the Investigation
www.alternet.org/story.html

After playing a tape of Cheney's statement, Russert asked Daschle, "Did the vice
president
call you and urge you not to investigate the events of Sept. 11?" Daschle flatly
contradicted Cheney: "Yes, he did, Tim, on Jan. 24, and then on Jan. 28 the
president
himself at one of our breakfast meetings repeated the request."

...."[T]hat request was made" by Cheney not only on Jan. 24 and by Mr. Bush
four days
later, but "on other dates following" as well.

6.

ABCNEWS.com : FBI Called off Terror Investigations
abcnews.go.com/sections/primetime/DailyNews/FBI_whistleblowers021219.html

Two veteran FBI investigators say they were ordered to stop investigations into
a
suspected terror cell linked to Osama bin Laden's al Qaeda network and the Sept.
11
attacks...

`You Will Not Open Criminal Investigations'

7.

October 9 2001 - The Times of India

"While the Pakistani Inter Services Public Relations claimed that former ISI
[the
"Pakistani CIA"] director-general Lt-Gen Mahmud Ahmad sought retirement after
being
superseded on Monday, the truth is more shocking. Top sources confirmed here on
Tuesday that the general lost his job because of the "evidence" India produced
to show his
links to one of the suicide bombers that wrecked the World Trade Center. The
U.S.
authorities sought his removal after confirming the fact that $100,000 were
wired to WTC
hijacker Mohammed Atta from Pakistan by Ahmad Umar Sheikh [Omar Saeed] at the
instance of General Mahmud [Ahmad]. Senior government sources have confirmed
that
India contributed significantly to establishing the link between the money
transfer and the
role played by the dismissed ISI chief. While they did not provide details, they
said that
Indian inputs, including [Omar Saeed's] mobile phone number, helped the FBI in
tracing
and establishing the link."


8.

No evidence was brought against Laden for nine eleven, none. [So according to
Bush's
official top secret Presidential directives] While Laden himself claimed
he played no
part in 911. Still, to save the lives of third worlders on the brink of
starvation, Laden
agreed to hand himself over, but Bush refused the offer, while CBC and CNN
denied
to report on that fact for the behalf of now dying dismembered American GIs.
Once the
indiscriminate bombing began, targeting almost every building in the country
of
Afghanistan, Laden then claimed he had no choice but to fight back to defend US
innocent from the ungodly enemies of Creation/Freedom. Then the clear to all
fake
video came out with an actor who's face wasn't even close to looking remotely
like Laden,
but for almost the facial hair. [Bridge of the Jamaican actor's nose is HALF
as long in
proportion to Laden’s for example, and surely frightfully shocking for some,
the actor
doesn't even take blame for 911 either!] Photos comparing the two faces never
aired on
CBC and CNN available in about twelve seconds with the power of the Internet.

9.

former FBI deputy director and murder victim John O'Neill

"the main obstacles to investigating Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate
interests and
the role played by Saudi Arabia."

10.

Alex Jones interviewing Former German Defense Minister Andreas Von Buelow

"Bush signed W199I months before 911 ordering the FBI not to stop Al-Qaeda. They
threatened to arrest FBI agent Robert Wright if he tells us what he knows."

11.

Mr. Bush was quoted somewhere regarding Mr. Laden's guilt of complete
innocence
with "We don't need any evidence, we know he's guilty."

12.

www.govexec.com/column/forwardTodaysColumn.cfm

" [FBI's] Edmonds concluded that documents clearly showed that the Sept. 11
hijackers
were in the country and plotting to use airplanes as missiles. She said
documents also
included information relating to their financial activities. "

13.

The honorable Argentinean oil company Bridas' relationship can not be
understated
as the Bush Administration's primary motive on criminal invasion of
Afghanistan to
save his biggest corporate backers, the American pension thieving Enron.


From "An American demands the truth from you" by Karl W. B. Schwarz

" I demand to know what energy companies were in that Cheney Energy Task Force
meeting and what discussions there were as to the steps that would be taken to
remove the
Taliban and Bridas Corporation as the last remaining obstacle to the United
States
controlling the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. I met that company in 1999 and have
known
since then about the Bridas v Unocal, $15 billion interference of contract
lawsuit in US
District Court, Southern District of Texas. I also know about the Fifth Circuit
Court of
Appeals decision on September 9, 2003 that upheld the Bridas $500 million
arbitration
settlement and the March 22, 2004 denial of Writ of Certiorari at the United
States
Supreme Court, Case 03-1018, Turkmenneft v Bridas."

14.

From "Fresh Memories of War" by Kandea Mosley, The Ithaca Journal (New
York), 25 May 2002:

"We were told there were no friendly forces," said [Army Private Matt]
Guckenheimer, an
assistant gunner with the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum. "If there was
anybody
there, they were the enemy. We were told specifically that if there were women
and
children to kill them."

15.

Quote from "A Dossier on Civilian Victims of United States' Aerial Bombing of
Afghanistan: A Comprehensive Accounting"

by Professor Marc W. Herold Ph.D., M.B.A., B.Sc.
Departments of Economics and Women's Studies McConnell Hall
Whittemore School of Business & Economics University of New Hampshire

When U.S warplanes strafed [with AC-130 gunships] the farming village of
Chowkar-
Karez, 25 miles north of Kandahar on October 22-23rd,killing at least 93
civilians, a
Pentagon official said, "the people there are dead because we wanted them dead."
The
reason? They sympathized with the Taliban.1 When asked about the Chowkar
incident,
Rumsfeld replied, "I cannot deal with that particular village."

16.

US TROOPS ADMIT SHOOTING IRAQI CIVILIANS
www.veteransforpeace.org/us_roops_admit_061903.htm

"American troops today admitted they routinely gun down Iraqi civilians - some
of whom
are entirely innocent.

And in an admission that directly contrasts with the line coming out from the
Pentagon's
spin doctors Specialist Corporal Michael Richardson added: "There was no
dilemma
when it came to shooting people who were not in uniform, I just pulled the
trigger."


The Crown would argue this issue isn’t in her jurisdiction, however, it is in
mine as a
expressive communicator fighting for freedom from real tyranny. An irrational
tyranny
that only stands exercised by corporate "news bite" censorship, and false
imprisonments.
An American Prosecutor put Sergeant Benderman in prison for refusing to kill
God’s
children. Now, what do you really think America would do, if "they" knew that
too?

17.

Bush demands total impunity on the war crimes he is personally responsible for

www.wsws.org/articles/2002/oct2002/icc-o12.shtml

18.

english.aljazeera.net/NR/exeres/FD57CF75-62E8-4C43-BF2D-2D0F0F89437B.htm

"Marines said the men fired on them. A senior officer said they had no weapons,
but that
with shots coming in the men were legitimate targets because they ran."

19.

www.yellowtimes.org/article.php

CAIR also wants the Pentagon to investigate a photograph circulating the
Internet of two
Iraqi boys and a U.S. soldier. A smiling soldier stands besides the two boys
who are
giving a "thumbs up" sign, as one of boys holds a sign written in English that
reads, "Lcpl
Boudreaux killed my Dad, th[en] he knocked up my sister!"

(Link to photo: www.cair-net.org/images/lcpl11.jpg)

20.

Guardian Wednesday 7, 2001 - "FBI claims bin Laden inquiry was frustrated"
[this story was on Bush’s top secret W199i directive]

This information would take a well paid intelligence officer, or CBC reporter no
more that
thirty seconds to look for follow ups. For, I know, the BBC did also a national
news
report on it.

21.

INTERVIEWER: Are you aware that this tank is contaminated with radiation?

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive.

INTERVIEWER: But we have measured it.

SOLDIER: No, it isn't radioactive, not this tank.

"Basra is on a river," he noted. "A DU shell poisons the water in a river. It
poisons the
grasses and the grains. It sinks into the ground and poisons the water table.
When it gets
into the body, it does incredible damage. The combination of radioactivity and
heavy
metal toxicity is such that it affects the DNA in such a way that you get
genetic
alterations."

[thousands of tons of measured radio-active toxic waste, heavy metals, oxidized
to
microscopic particles as small as a tenth of a micron have been deposited in our
airspace,
however, CBC and CNN have refused to inform ourselves on the scientifically
measurable
extremely serious health concern issue..]

22.

Justice Department lawyer John Yoo, "In the exercise of his plenary power to use
military
force," Yoo insisted, "the President's decisions are for him alone and are
unreviewable."
Yoo was also quoted recently on CBC national news report regarding the torturing
of
innocent people to death, to state something like "President Bush doesn’t have
to justify
his opinions to Canada or even to the United States for that matter."

23.

The incriminating FBI email dated 22 May 2004, indicates that president Bush
personally
signed off on certain interrogation techniques in an executive order."
(See original at globalresearch.ca/articles/FBI.121504.4940_4941.pdf)

24.

U.S. deserter 'didn't want to have to kill babies'

"Mr. House will argue that American soldiers are guilty of war crimes and that
forcing
Mr. Hinzman to fight in Iraq would have made him a war criminal.

He will call as a witness former U.S. Marine Staff Sergeant Jimmy Massey, who is
expected to testify that he and other soldiers shot more than 30 unarmed Iraqis,
including women and a six-year-old child, at a U.S.
military checkpoint."

25.

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A45373-2004Dec7.html

that a clandestine military task force in Iraq was beating detainees, ordering
Defense
Intelligence Agency debriefers out of the room during questioning, confiscating
evidence
of the abuse and intimidating the debriefers when they complained."

26.

www.truthout.org/docs_04/printer_121004W.shtml

A sacked CIA official is reportedly suing the agency for allegedly retaliating
against him
for refusing to falsify his reports on Iraq's weapons of mass destruction to
support the
White House's pre-war position.

27.

``I was faced with being deployed to Iraq to do what the infantry does, kill
people, and I
had no justification for doing so,'' he testified. ``This was a criminal war.
Any act of
violence in an unjustified conflict is an atrocity.''

28.

Williams's squad stopped a dump truck, and an Iraqi climbed out. "Light him up!"
the
sergeant ordered, according to testimony, and the squad opened fire, killing the
unarmed
man. Williams and a squadmate reportedly got into an argument over which of them
had
scored Company C's first kill.

29.

It gets worse. We already knew about the Franklin County, Ohio, precinct that
tallied
4,258 votes for Bush when only 638 people had actually voted.

30.

middleeastinfo.org/forum4970
wallofhate.com

Israeli Soldiers Going In For The Kill: A 13 year old Palestinian [JEWISH]
school girl is
about to die

"It's a little girl. She's running defensively eastwards, a girl of about 10.
She's behind the
embankment, scared to death."

"Anyone who's mobile, moving in the zone, even if it's a three-year-old, needs
to be
killed."

31.

US forces unleashed more than 20 air strikes and some 60 artillery rounds on
Monday,
said Major Todd Desgrosseilliers. [...] An AFP reporter in the Jolan district
said one
building in every 10 had been flattened. As US-led troops closed in on the
neighborhood
overnight, at least four 900-kilogram bombs were dropped in the city's
northwest.

[destructive radius of a 900-kilogram bomb is half a kilometer, and all TRUE
accounts
of death rates for Fallujah alone, a city where the population was forbidden to
leave,
exceed two hundred thousand innocent souls.]

32.

The Bush Administration
In rush to defend White House, Rice trips over own words
Friday, March 26 @ 10:12:40 EST

By Walter Pincus and Dana Milbank, San Francisco Chronicle

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the
White House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al
Qaeda and
the Taliban. The CIA contradicted Rice's earlier assertion that Bush had
requested a CIA
briefing in the summer of 2001 because of elevated terrorist threats. And Rice's
assertion
this week that Bush had told her on Sept. 16, 2001, that "Iraq is to the side"
appeared to be
contradicted by an order signed by Bush on Sept. 17 directing the Pentagon to
begin
planning military options for an invasion of Iraq."

[ And...]

www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A25177-2004Mar25.html

"Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage contradicted Rice's claim that the
White
House had a strategy before Sept. 11 for military operations against al Qaeda
and the
Taliban."

This indicates that with the foreknowledge gained through prior experiences of
Muslim
fundamentalists, such as the Taliban, being forbidden by their religion [Jihad]
to persecute
the innocent, left the Bush Administration with only needing to do, and had
officially
done, was to use no evidence to back up allegations to insure invasion plans,
and as a
result, a deliberate treasonous criminal strategy to not follow the crime scene
leads at the
real murder scene to nab to true evil doers. For otherwise - spoil the top
secret plot.

33.

Blix nor Elbaradei, nor Kofi, suggested, implied, or stated, that Iraq had
failed to
comply with the newest U.N. resolution: 1441.

HANS BLIX: "And at this juncture, we are able to perform professional
no-notice
inspections all over Iraq and to increase aerial surveillance..."

With complete, one hundred percent access to go where ever the Bush
Administration
pleased without delay, left a situation of an unjust war only detrimental to an
ability to
bring about any good or better thing. American soldiers are being sacrificed
for no better
good or reason understood, for if progress will ever be made, it will be when
they work to
bring about a political situation that was there in Iraq before the Bush
Administration
starting murdering innocent people for nothing . Well, not completely, for
Bremer shipped
19 billion to Greenspan early on, then, hundreds of millions were sent back.


34.

Professor Steven E. Jones, a tenured BYU professor, went public several weeks
ago after
releasing a 19 page academic paper, essentially showing how the laws of physics
do not
support the WTC's freefall and, consequently, the official government story.
It should be known that World Trade Center Building Seven was not struck by an
airplane, yet fell exactly the same as the two towers.

Below both towers were found pools of molten steel, only creatable with the
heating
by high explosives.

Excerpts from "Me, Art Bell, and 9-11 by Lisa Guliani"

The official version of the WTC collapses defy both Galileo's Law of Falling
Bodies, and
also Isaac Newton's First Law of Motion.

..if we know that hydrocarbon fires can only reach a maximum temperature of 1517
degrees Fahrenheit, how could they possibly have melted this steel, when the
melting
point of steel is 2,795 degrees and the boiling point of steel (when it becomes
a molten
liquid) is 5,182 degrees Fahrenheit.

The existence of these burning pools of molten steel were confirmed by:

- Mark Lorieux of Controlled Demolition, Inc
- Peter Tully, President of Tully Construction
- and the American Free Press newspaper


35.

"To be truthful about it, there was no way we could have got the public consent
to have
suddenly launched a campaign on Afghanistan but for what happened on September
11..."

Tony Blair Speaking To House of Commons Liaison Committee

36.

The Washington Post, 23 September 2001.

At American urging, Ahmed traveled ... to Kandahar, Afghanistan. There he
delivered the
bluntest of demands. Turn over bin Laden without conditions, he told Taliban
leader
Mohammad Omar, or face certain war with the United States and its allies.

Mahmoud's meetings on two separate missions with the Taliban were reported as a
"failure." Yet this "failure" to extradite Osama without providing a shred of
eidence was
part of Washington's documented design, providing a pretext for a military
intervention
which was already in the pipeline. If Osama had been extradited, the main
justification for
waging a war "against international terrorism" would no longer hold. Nor would
the ready
to go Patriot Act. Incidentally, when MSNBC contacted the Whitehouse regarding
the top
secret invasion of Afghanistan plan, it was confessed that the plan had been
"fully
implemented"


38.

"Why of course the people don't want war ... But after all it is the leaders of
the country
who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people
along,
whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a
communist
dictatorship ... Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the
leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being
attacked, and
denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to
danger." --
Hermann Goering, Nazi leader, at the Nuremberg Trials after World War II

39.

On the wall of the National Holocaust Museum: " Thou shall not be a victim, thou
shall
not be a perpetrator, and thou shall not be a by-stander"



----------------


When we cancel other people's human rights, we cancel our own.

=Helen & Harry Highwater=

---

HELP ME FOR CHRIST SAKE!

Please, I beg you to assist me in this cause immediately!

Ack! It turns out that there IS a criminal conspiracy run out of the
Winnipeg Police Department's Exploitation Unit!

Ack!! It turns out that the Crown IS aiding and abetting the
terrorist crimes of first degree mass murder!!

Ack!!! It turns out the Judge threw this whole Revelation thing out
without any consideration offered, while the Crown is currently
working on a public ban of disclosure in Winnipeg on these
continuing documented crimes!!!

50,000!! a pop! Stolen from law abiding business owners!!!

Crimes forwarded to the public in part by the concern of Manitoba's Premier!!!!!

SEND THIS TO EVERY RCMP OFFICER OR SOLDIER OF FORTUNE YOU CAN FIND!

Send this post for me to also Winnipeg media persons or to anyone who
will listen. If you don't, then, you ain't my friend. Come on! Do
something for us, and I promise to help you out later if I can.
Help me through the goodness of your heart, so we won't get
railroaded into prison fraudulently by those that hide in darkness
as pirates of our human will. The will to be free.


The Crown's interpretations of my possessions are not my expressions!!

I AM INNOCENT.

The Judge through this whole thing out for the defense
without any consideration offered to OUR COURT!

NO EXPLAINATION!

HELP!!!

---

Since I am representing myself on these particular criminal matters, Legal Aid
is not required to lend assistance on the grounds that I'm not co-operating with
the system as it operates through professional Barred representations. [I am
eligible for walk in consultations but nothing of the sort of assistance I am
requesting] Considering the complexity of my judicial matter, I would request
legal assistance from the Court in these following areas.

1. National Security Issues

I need assistance in understanding the legal statutes that our national
security services are obligated to practice under, to insure our national
security matters are being truly defended in my respect. No change in summation
of my character was altered, after they were granted a search warrant to verify
it was me who publicly spoke out for honorable FBI officers denied their rights
to speak freely, then as the Court knows, instead of doing what they argued to
grant such privilege to infringe on my personal liberty, enforced a less than
perfect law that most others would buckle under, even if they harbored no
criminal intent, and would never do anything to infringe on the rights of any
child. For I challenge; it does not serve Canada's interest (in particular our
teen soldiers) to knowingly have Canada propagandized under the serious
failures of CBC and the National Security Services to lend no wanting cry to
hear REAL FBI officers who factually allege, with evidence and everything,
President Bush's business partner, (who was at the Whitehouse Sept. 9th working
on the top secret invasion of Afghanistan strategy to heavily arm heroin
pushers who war to keep women as slaves while weaponizing children - done all
for a liquefied gas pipe line to profit his darling dear Enron) funded 9/11's
"mastermind" "ringleader" Mohammad Atta. Inside sources from the RCMP have
notified me, that in the last four years, Section D's salaried employees, have
done practically nothing to serve Canada's interest in this respect. While
Canada's CSIS does not have the legal ability to speak out publicly regarding
the criminal transgressions of President Bush, and because of this nature of
CSIS's position, they have almost only fears to live with by trying. A CSIS
officer told me, many were completely aware of President Bush's criminality
regarding his hugely treasonous actions of mass murder on 9/11, but could do
practically nothing about it outside of filing the reports with the federal
government, or maybe anonymously sending something to CBC, with no promises that
anyone would actually read it. All the while, the senior CSIS boss brags
contemptuously in public about his ties and commitment to his friends in the
ISI. Perceived easily/mistakenly I'd imagine as a threat to all of Canada's
Honorable police officers and Judges. [General Ahmad was the Bush junta's
appointed head of the ISI.] I think Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin is
genuinely a good man, but it is hard to see him publicly take a stand on this
issue, [if he even received said reports] on behalf of honorable police officers
and soldiers everywhere, in defense of the human race, risking everything,
considering he already does bring about a great deal of good for Canadians where
he stands. [Compared to you know, a let's send the kids to war for whatever
Harper, or nobody in Winnipeg ("officially" 86%) wants us to give away the
public assets so let's do it anyway for ourselves privately Filmon] But to know
the RCMP's Section D, sides that they can't tell us the top secret reason they
have not perused Justice for the sake of Canadian soldiers who bravely put their
lives on the line, of which some have already died, is a situation no Canadian
would tolerate if they knew these freely available facts to decide for
themselves. Sure we can be counted lucky that only so few Canadians have died
thus far, but when will the sacrifice of Americans, Afghanis, Iraqis, and soon
to be Iranians with the Syrians, along with more than fifty other countries
officially marked for death by the lawlessly irrational bushite terrorists, be
more than YOUR willing to bare? As publicly reported repeatedly in European
press, Mr. Sattler ordered the bombing of health care clinics in Fallujah as
first strike targets because he didn't want doctors or nurses to "falsely"
report that his forces target primarily the innocent to steal more from America
in blood and treasure. Then under Sattler's command, they proceeded to
monstrously murder more than two hundred thousand innocent souls, while covering
the region in radio-active toxic waste that will continue to kill for a
scientifically estimated billion or two years. Hell on Earth is what un-
arrested Sattler represents as an enemy to all living things. God included. An
aside: Did you know the commander of the Third Infantry, Maj. Gen. Buford 'buff'
Blount III, is truly a Saudi Wahhabist in disguise, who took up the job at the
request of the Bush junta, and subsequently left near 170 tons of plastic
explosives unprotected for looting in Qaqaa? Why? Well when asked why he
commanded to leave the weapons unattended to instead, go carnage Baghdad, with,
I'm serious, sanctioned thieving expeditions, he replied, he just wanted to let
us know he was there. "We just wanted to let them know that we're here.'' In
Basra, the coalition is still leaving as of last week, more than 30 known
weapons storage facilities unprotected. See, the neo-con peenacker gang can't
steal everything without a stupid man war going. Left continuing unattended
without national discussions, leaves further in it's wake, more innocent victims
of war crimes fallen undefended. I would ask that instead of me seeking to find
where it is written, that the RCMP must be committed to getting the man for nine
eleven, perhaps I can just request we work together, for a national CBC radio
forum kicked off by some kinda joint, international press release acknowledging
briefly our failures to communicate in the past, and politely request where
Canada could go through open line discussions on these very serious matters. We
must not allow our soldiers to be made misinformed by CBC's unwillingness to
bravely with honor, defend our great Nation. Or, perhaps, Canada might want to
consider hiring me on as, we'll see how it goes honorary RCMP spokesperson?, a
paid consultant for my expertise in recognizing the real bad guys, and then I'll
go out there, and win the good fight by using praise with fewer insults. If we
stay committed to defending freedom by defeating war criminals, we all will be
the better for it. Now, take me to your leader.

2. Local Police Issues

As so was brought to the attention of the Courts in the previous motions,
through considering the charge that was brought against me, (where no criminal
intent in alleged, and nobody can possibly see a digital image until it is
already at least in one's possession, case closed, I'm free to go still without
my stolen computer gear.) I discover, the child exploitation unit is not
operating in a manner that would effectually reduce the proliferation of truly
illegal materials. They have included images to demonize me that they must know
are left legal to distribute, or for those couple images categorized as for
sure illegal unto themselves, are left publicly unhindered when it comes to
Police questioning in a manner that would concern illegal public expressions.
Now, I personally don't believe the Courts are consciously operating in a
nefarious manner deliberately to steal computer gears to sell as sadomasochists
who enjoy seeing lovers of life go to prison falsely for five year stints, but
come on, something seriously needs to be done in how things there are run. I
believe the failures are, in part, do to the personal fears officers have of the
information universe; for to acknowledge information sharing through p2p
networks or Usenet, would be to witness criminal code violations by the score
going corporately unaddressed. Like Bush being guilty for high treason in God's
America for example, Iraqi church goers slaughtered by faithful Bush lovers,
women raped by "freedom fighting" GIs, the sex slave trade, or that VLT's are
being run criminally (section 209, 380(1) 380(2), 181, 52(1-4) with a math game
scam that even a sixth grader can figure, but not the "Free Press" editor, or
commercial savvy CJOB's Vic G-----. Being our city's big Bush backers, where our
dying universe is simpler, like "we don't need any evidence, we know he's
guilty", refuses a, trying to be responsible citizen to formulate their own
conclusions through our media on why we have laws. Anyway, I need to have some
one to cross check the "illegal" images through recorded internet domains, to
see which ones are/were located in Canada and elsewhere, and what if any
attempt the exploitation unit tried to limit found providers. I suspect many
providers they would claim they can't do anything about, are so not because a
crime is occurring, but in that respect, actual evidence of criminal conduct
would be required before an internet provider, server, or site owner could be
recommended for censorship. Not this, twenty year olds look like they could be
ten year olds, or that, simply naked children being human should not be viewed
in their/our minds as something youthfully beautiful.

To Police effectually, I would suggest a public domain transparently coded
checksum program checker to automatically recognize, known illegal materials
made available free, with a downloadable database updated by the work of one or
two officers monitoring currently available internet image traffic -
classifiable almost near the speed of electricity across the country. This
action is good to take despite my personal innocence or fraudulent guilt, for
media labelings are completely impossible to designate content/control, but as
such, shouldn't forbid Police services from locating where possibly actual
hugely offensive content is being distributed through. With volunteer co-
operation of programming, a user, server, or internet service provider could
be warned of material almost in their possession as expression is classified
criminal so then simply delete it, and carry on. I'm confident such Police
planning with open for public appeals to fine tune further, would end putting
the hugely profitable exploitation units across the continent almost completely
out of business. Now, who truly wants that?

3. Constitutional Challenges

This possession charge absent intent, where everybody is auto guilty to lose all
their stolen computer gear through fraudulent demonization of the innocent
included, is a for sure, crime in progress. I'd imagine if we had a public
inquiry, we'd find what the exploitation crews are doing, is needing to locate
only a small few arguably illegal depictions, then trumping up a lot of
fraudulent totals. Figuring, I'd imagine, if they openly started convicting
individuals for a couple of images they perhaps deleted when witnessed, people
might begin to ask, just how much money is the unit taking in sold stolen
merchandise? Perhaps 50,000 dollars in a single case where the business owner of
said stolen property wasn't even charged for a criminal offense! No troublesome
Court appearance required to protect your public business image even! Generally,
in cases that do reach trial, all images are seldomly reviewed by the Courts,
and at the "professional" porno viewers discretion, or the Crown, a small sample
is only offered. [The professional naked people person they have in my case I
suspect is lost somewhere in bushville as the clinically insane, or just
extremely helpful to my Judicial cause, thanks big guy, either way.] This has
worked largely unhindered because lawyers for the defense wouldn't generally see
a connection. For only one freely available image that you couldn't see until
you already had it, is all that is needed to put a, loss for words Canadian, in
prison for half a decade. Not only that, but such convictions insist
irrationally that the guilty must also be sexually deviant and require
professional counseling. The law enforced absent rights infringed needs to be
Constitutionally challenged as clearly unjust, and the sentencing structure as
being seriously cruel. [What does one guilty of an actual assault for
comparison get, or better yet, threat of assault that was never truly made?] So,
as a result, I need the assistance of Constitutional lawyers who would provide
me consultations on prepatory requirements and on the relevant Constitutional
questions regarding this specific challenge. And maybe co-operation with the
Crown or Police chief to tally records and total sales figures on cases under
similar circumstances to consider the exploitation unit for re-evaluation.
[Example: The foolish, faith in ignorance argument given by all similar units,
is that nothing can be securely deleted from a hard drive is assuredly patently
ridiculous. Truly indicative however, that we do indeed have a real hidden
problem here regarding their/our intelligence gathering capabilities.] While
maybe supporting public discussions on how to even improve further, the
valuable work that the exploitation unit surely does do already somewhere I'm
sure to operate for our interests. We may together have to overthrow CJOB with
our human skills at demanding some space to talk about bettering our lives by
communicating without two minute commercials every five minutes, and opening up
the phone lines to talk about whatever. They take too much from us as the
clearly disenfranchised already. Like, so who's talk radio station is it anyway?

4. The Crown's Crown

I have concerns regarding the job requirements that our community asks a Crown
to bravely achieve. One, would be to pursue Justice for the principled
betterment of our society. It is clear to anyone familiar with my case, that our
corporate media managers have decided for one fear or another, that such noble
reaches must be left from the grasp of Canadian soldiers and their loving giving
families. This place the Court holds of a principle that all people should be
treated fairly, includes those we know Bush has already had murdered in America
under these left silenced demands for a true accounting by good police work
completed already. The fear that every criminal Court Crown shrugs off when
proudly defending the innocent in our legal challenges, seems thus far, absent
in support of Justice for Johnny. When I read statements from the Crown stating,
John's legal arguments against traitor Bush is irrelevant to the case our Crown
hold's against myself, in our name as Canadians, smacks of an unjust and blind
totalitarian state. Corporately broadcasted uncertainty is forsaking the
innocent lives of Bush's continuing real murder victims. Certainly, the Crown
has a responsibility to pursue just causes, and granted, can falsely suspect I
don't hold the best of intentions towards life with everything I am. However,
the Crown's summations of my character will never change the official FBI's
conclusions arrived at by following the crime scene leads, at the real murder
scene, to discover who personally is still escaping arrest for mass murder of
our good friends in New York City on 9/11. A crime who's principle perpetrators
obviously faithfully count on this form of injustice to dictate continuous
failures by our Crown to serve our public interest. For whatever reason, my case
documents a corporate news agenda of non-committal in our pursuit of Justice
for ourselves as the little people. Ourselves, including the Crown's of all
Canada, are, without doubt, denied fair representation by CBC standards. Canada
is being left not defending honorable American police officers, doing their jobs
to the best of their ability, should not leave too, our Public's Crown
unrepresented. (If the Crowns of Canada so willed it in our names.) So, I would
ask that the Crown's refusal to speak out for Canada, while fighting to silence
my cries with an unjust as cruel prison sentence, be investigated for
obstructing Justice, and therefore, aiding and abetting the terrorist crimes of
first degree mass murder. Now, how to do this... I'm not sure. Perhaps the
Court's assistance of aid in the form of one or two Crown offices from a
different province in Canada could be considered, or a Constitutional Law firm
more up on what all I got to work with here. Look, somebody has tricked my
nation, and subsequently our naiver youths, into excepting Canadians can not
hear the silenced screams of global tyranny. If soldiers the world over need
to die for Bush, let it be for something worth fighting. Freedom must be Canada,
a Canada that would go if asked, in favor of Universal Justice always. Just ask
US.


Your Friend,

John W.

-----------------

I know I'm innocent under the law
as it currently stands, and in addition, I wished to teach our Courts why the
law stands
unjust against our public in other respects. With no criminal intent to obtain
or
distribute something illegal alleged against myself, and the simple truth that
one can
not perceive an image until it is at the very least, already in one's
possession, says
enough by itself. But most importantly, the Crown's interpretations of my
possessions are
not my expressions. Example: I could have in my possession a written work from
one who
espouses the glories of war criming, but I, personally, am diametrically opposed
to it's
unwise declarations. I still use it however to gain understanding of my world in
which I
politically work to improve God's World through indivisibly principled reason.



Feel free to do with this as you will.


---------------




THE QUEEN'S BENCH


WINNIPEG CENTRE




NOTICE OF MOTION

For an Order of Production



BETWEEN:




HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,



and



JOHNNY WIZARD




Accused.





This Notice of Motion regarding an Order of Production is to have disclosed to
the defense, the complete evidence without undue hindrance, evidence the Crown
holds against the accused as a member of our public. These following
arguments are the reasons why Justice must prevail in these proceedings:


Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms section 7. "No person shall be
deprived of life, liberty or security of the person except in accordance with
the principles of fundamental justice."

R. v. Stinchcombe "[...] counsel for the Crown is under a general duty to
disclose all relevant information."

In R. v. Stinchcombe, the Supreme Court of Canada held once again, as any
legitimate Court of any land would, that the accused in criminal cases has a
Constitutional right to full and complete disclosure of the Crown's case.
Yet, in the criminal case involving myself, the Crown's refusal to return my
legal property [such as including my actual expressions] is motivated by
contempt for fundamental justice - for true accountability - by intentionally
working to deceive our Courts through denying the evidence of one: the charge
against me is truly fraudulent under our law as it stands currently, and two:
that I don't already have the silent moral support of every honorable top
secret intelligence officer this world over.


Canada's "Commission of Inquiry into the Actions of Canadian Officials in
Relation to Maher Arar"

"The RCMP notes that because national security investigations are criminal
investigations, the possibility of judicial scrutiny always exists and the
presence of this possibility acts as an indirect accountability mechanism."
[Maher Arar was an innocent Canadian tortured and left for murdered by the
irrational as criminal pro-bush forces negatively influencing Canadian
jurisprudence.]


Firstly, I, like any, need ready easy access to all the evidence the Crown
holds against myself, to indicate a possibly hidden motive behind her criminal
allegations. For it is in our authority as a free society that the Crown
holds any legitimacy.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls.

I need to provide the evidence of my actual expressions to counter balance the
false interpretations the Crown alleges, when it comes to asking where
specifically the rights of a child are being compromised when she makes her
defined as sexually dysfunctional inferences. All the images on my computer,
deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Similarly, are all the written
texts on my computer those of words I hold to be my own personal philosophy.
As indicated by the Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe case, a defense against
fraudulent accusations regarding the Rights of our children being compromised,
can be readily addressed early on by understanding the possession charge in
relative context to the personal life of the accused.


R. v. Sharpe

"Section 163.1(6) creates a further defence for material that serves an
"educational, scientific or medical purpose". This refers to the purpose the
material, viewed objectively, may serve, not the purpose for which the
possessor actually holds it."

So, purpose of digital media as determined illegal must therefore, be backed
firstly by criminal intent, for without any intent you have no purpose. A
defense is made available by the Sharpe decision on personal\professional
conduct to indicate actual established purpose of accused to prevent blind
"overreaching". The Supreme Court of Canada's deep concerns of "overreaching"
are very much apparent in my particular criminal matter. Conduct of
individuals who have lost their purpose in Police keeping, who aren't being
managed to express through our Police actions, a public interest in where the
"offensable" images are coming from, or came, but instead, where it's all
going as potential new innocent porno victims with millions of dollars worth
of stuff they can get away stealing. [I've read porno cops in America
recently acquired 300,000 more American names of households to raid, off of
one single server found managed in violation, but have taken a pause before
then moving on to arrest anybody who has ever used the internet for whatever,
to consider, just what have we gotten ourselves into here.] See, perfectly
legal imagery can be made into illegal thoughts relatively quickly by the
weaker irrationals that exist within our police services. Where, to prove for
the record, a twenty two year old is only twelve, even when she has in her
possession all her proper paperwork, completed puberty, a living mother, a
popular working web site and historical documentations, is just foolishly
impossible. While at Your end Mr. Surfer Citizen, your demonized guilty,
until proven innocent of thinking their faulting criminal perceptions, they do
practically nothing to verify. Without needing to establish intent, they make
off like bandits. See, under a simple possession charge, there is no
allegations of intent to obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise,
not found a responsible public's interest in seeking the means of which the
criminal content was as could be LEGALLY provided. The last thing we want in
our dying world is a setup where private legal businesses are selling,
promoting, and releasing content that only becomes illegal when the
exploitation unit comes into your home to steal your stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

By exercising our right to perceive representations of that which is made
freely available, is of in itself, important to the sociologist, psychologist,
concerned parent, and of course, the conceptualizing artist reflecting on our
shared reality.

My private and public expressions are more tuned to those who are personally
responsible in escaping arrest for running death squads against innocent
children in Afghanistan financed by the undefended as uniformed American tax
paying Public, [10th Mountain Division] a criminal enterprise still cashing in
on the rewards of bush's mass murder campaigns. Or, the dropping of cluster
dud land mines throughout residential school districts to murder our children
indiscriminately. Mercury tainted vaccines that for sure cause irreparable
damage to North American children, or as currently, about John DeCamp's just
released updated 2005 edition, about the secret White House-linked national
child sex-ring entitled "The Franklin Cover-up." However, the real motivating
factor [intent] in the Crown's purpose by attempting to pirate our public's
right to defend Ourselves judiciously, is more specifically because I
articulate the HONORABLE FBI's official publicly available findings on who
orchestrated, and funded the crimes of 911. Namely, Mr. Bush Jnr. along
with his business partner, the still escaping Lieutenant General Mahmoud
Ahmad.


[University of Ottawa Professor Michel Chossudovsky, has researched the
Ahmad/Bush relationship as documented by CNN ABC et al, and can be quested for
at www.globalresearch.ca]

www.globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO206A.html
www.prisonplanet.com/new_revelations_on_911.htm

The Crown to not fight on our behalf regarding this easily verifiable mass
murder issue, is indicative of an intention, to cast aside the concern of all
children who benefit from my communicating higher truths for the betterment of
the entire public body. I ask our Court, who, in Canada, informs our public
truthfully as I do, that the "scumbags" Canada's own General Hillier is
referring to get Canadian youths for sure killed over in his nationally
broadcasted barbaric adolescent bigotry, against all the INNOCENT students of
Afghanistan, is of a People who factually opened up schools for girls under
the Taliban's getting better through communicating leadership?, and who
outlawed Bush's heroin production, and the slavery and rape of women? Women
who were when working at the Taliban's newspaper, were not required to wear
burkas despite CBC's propaganda to the contrary? The Crown would suggest her
ignorance on such subjects is irrelevant to her case against me, for those
children's lives, and others like them, are not who she is working to protect.
So, where I demand is a crime against our real God occurring I ask the hiding
in darkness Crown to explain herself publicly in the light of these
proceedings to our Honorable Lord.

The Crown's case argues that a determined selection of legal images, can be
sited under a labeled classification of "collateral images", as somehow, unto
it's separated self, being an indicator, or summation of my unbridled
character. Therefor, to question such interpretations I need the luxury and
comforts of a stress free environment to ponder the significant meaning of
each of these collateral damages against ourselves as the innocent the Crown
argues for as a weapon of Justice. For, those personally responsible for
making repeatedly easily verifiable faulting expressions with the evidence the
Crown refuses to return to me as my legal property, are in all likelihood,
still blabbering corporately un-accosted, the completely blind support of
indiscriminate mass murder in thoughtless praise for war criminal traitor to
Humanity George Bush Jr., their supreme no nothing about squat leader. While
myself, am a well documented public defender of children's rights and a
studious observant researcher on media matters, who is schooled in the
field(s) of Psychology and Genetics, Sexuality and Religion, along with the
chaotic order to the indivisible nature of life ourselves. [And who when not
terribly busy building this needed defense against the Crown's alleged
criminality, still champion the written word for Justice being - US all as
treated fairly.]]

I also need to show, how I come to be in possession of another's expressions,
of some managed images, or some strewn texts.

It would be unfair for our Courts to side with the unjust Crown on not giving
me ready easy access to the evidence, but for only by hugely limiting degrees
that include costly bus rides, or as the seriously impractical, hundreds of
thousands of printed texts that would likely fill roomfuls. While sitting
just outside my police door, could be the public accuser who professes proudly
the deeply ignorant ungodly beliefs of cop killing and heroin dealing to push
US all over the top with Bush as it's global mastermind. Knowing such an
enemy of freedom who taunts all our judicial matters with true personal self
contempt, is there still escaping public ridicule, wearing our community's
Police Officer uniform, could create unto itself, an unneeded frustration on
my part, for, I am a honorable defender to all that is Just. A honorable
defender that is needing by threat of false imprisonment to concentrate on
Justice for just myself personally currently. As the Court well knows, a
bushite's favored public intent is well established by the evidence, as
documented truly criminal being the ungodly. [Hypnotized lawless through the
mechanics of suggestion I would diagnose for the don't know knowing any
better.] There exists no evidence against bin Laden for 911, nor, was any
factually alleged to exist, and despite what Bush broadcasts unchallenged
nationally on our airwaves privately, Saddam did actually let the inspectors
in to go where ever they wanted without delay. Furthermore, indiscriminately
murdering people with tens of thousands of cluster dud land mines, 9000
missiles targeting public infrastructure, many multiple 2000 pound bombs
containing radio-active toxic waste, along with the new and improved napalm
and phosphorous poison gas clouds all because we are in the approximate age
range of 15 to 55 is a for sure real war crime going unaddressed publicly by
the Crown, but not by myself. So, the Crown's interest is in jeopardizing the
lives of our children for sure by working to silence my extremely rare public
cries for true accountability here in Winnipeg.

I am sworn to protect all as indicated by my recorded actions and praised
world wide word. The National Supreme Court of Canada's Sharpe decision
allows this defense to be made on our behalf.

By Our Honorable Court's "Lord" siding to support claims made by my false
accusers - as the running definitive summation of what can be claimed as
"collateral images" - [legal relative media content present on my computer,]
while judging to refuse to have returned my therefore stolen legal property so
I can adequately prepare a counter defense against the Crown's confusions, is
nothing short of a crime in progress. At least it should be. By denying me
the evidence the Crown holds in contempt of our Court, would create an undue
hardship on my, seeking to illuminate the facts from our vantage points.
Having to travel back and forth across the city to view hundreds of thousands
of media messages pertinent to my case at hand, left denied search tools, and
a comfortable atmosphere, is unduly unfair for all concerned. Now, I know, I
have to deal personally with those who support such a criminal ungodly nature
when I have no choice to, but to have them located in the same listening
vicinity throughout all my inquiries on stolen legal media content, to spew
their boastful chauvinistic fascist state partiality of how great George W.
Bush is as their master thinking celebrated American Cop Killer, would leave
me unfairly tensioned. I need the meditative comforts of home study with good
coffee and private friends to ponder my adroit, to the point defense with the
evidence I demand the fair right to contend.


I hold children's rights paramount in the public defense stands I've made for
near a decade, and privately, I'm free to think my way on anything. The Crown
has no right to dictate what my private thoughts are, especially, if I'm not
granted to speak on her conclusions with the ready made evidence she don't
want me to have returned possession of. My legal property that the Crown's
crew has plans to sell! God, are you listening?

I need the luxury of computer processing that the Crown used to surmise her
relative faulting judgment of my worth to our society.

I need returned all my legal possessions, like my real expressions such as
public communications, to fairly challenge the Crown's refusal to consider
such objectiveness on who the one holding criminal intent actually is on this
serious matter. So therefore, the Crown's crew should not be allowed by our
law to sell my stolen property as they are planning, while surely as
sadomasochists, destroying a life time of my written works they know mean a
great deal to me personally. Wishing to deprive our rights as the community,
to be granted fair treatment in our Court systems of accountability, is surely
what will happen if our Honorable Judge does not Judge honorably against the
Crown and grant me the legal return of my stolen property. I need to
establish the mechanics of my specifically unique computer system, so I can
establish my fair defense made available by the Supreme Court of Canada's
Standing Sharpe decision.

The Court recognizes finding that all declared illegal possessions serve a
criminal purpose without any intent, unless found serving otherwise by made
available evidence from the defense. [ergo my Constitutional challenge]
Evidence of real purpose the Crown doesn't want to grant our Court, because
usually, guilty or innocent, they do sell everybody's stolen stuff actually.
And truly, the Crown has expressed no interest in assisting our Police
agencies in apprehending those known responsible by the evidence for first
degree mass murders. [Instead, pick on the helpless innocent little Jewish
man bearing a cross, as cowardly brown shirt jack boot nazi fascists under
Hitler would have too. [surprising for many, it is formally illegal to be
Jewish currently in God's Israel. As for the Crowns in my case, and the
Judge, well they seem to be not all that bad over all. [So far... But this
innocent people go to prison for speaking un-contended truths thing for me is
just some extreme to the core serious business of ours, and good or bad, the
Judges, and the Crowns, and the Police Officers have a paid job to do by
following the rules designed ultimately in purpose to protect both me and you.
So, can't we all just find a way to get our public news agencies to live up to
our responsibilities by recognizing standing laws not yet enforced against the
un-elected dictator, the monstrous war mongering American traitor criminal,
911's George Bush Jnr., instead of present company???]]]

I need returned my 37,333 [minus the contended for argument] images to
sensibly consider their feasibility to collectively represent the Crown's
faulting illogical argument in a brighter picture.

I need to show what I did with obtained media information on general terms by
mechanical processing through my very specific as unique operating systems,
and through my definitive writing on the very subject we are here considering.
I need operating script batch programs that do specific tasks regarding
general media managements.

I need to show how Usenet [early raw based sub-internet knowledge sharing
web communications system] is used, and how it was legally accessed by my
specific personal system, granting me, to be a part of one of the greatest
collected artistic expressions of the known world. And how, when using such
services, informations aren't found perceived until, at the very least, they
are already in one's possession, thereby making the Crown's standing
accusation absent criminal intent clearly unjust. [those responsible for
distribution/expression of actual for real illegal depictions are where the
infraction against the public's interest can be compromised, but the
exploitation units I'm aware of seem to have little of no financial interest
in recognizing such a wanting to lose their lucrative industry brokered
through what should be worked to be made into redundancy.]

I need returned possession of my computer content, to seek for indicative
examples of huge disparities with what is described with the Crown's own
relative definitions, and what my media machine actually contains regarding my
for real expressions. I need to reference my personal writings surmising the
faulting state of the child porn policing industry. To surmise grand totals,
as such the Crown's crew alleges of legal content she'll bemoan despairingly
of collateral damages against us as innocence. Knock knock knock.

If the Crown argues falsely that the evidence I request is irrelevant to her
criminal case, then what could the harm be honestly in showing the error of
her ways? If she argues it jeopardizes to expose the true criminality used to
try convicting me, an innocent honorable man in Our name, I would move that
the charge against me be stayed, my property returned, and the Courts help me
make a Constitutional challenge to the validity of the law, while
communicating also Your dissatisfaction in not having us heard speaking out
nationally for the truly Honorable FBI - against 911's true money man -
Lieutenant General Mahmoud Ahmad - getting away as bush's not so secret any
longer private business partner, escaping he is from the mass murder of
thousands of our good friends, the still left undefended corporate Americans.

I need to know what settings were set in place for the installed programs to
access the internet. And a whole bunch else besides.

In conclusion, I need to show where my outstanding character was at, by
indicating exactly what I spent my free time on, to illustrate for our Court,
my TRUE intent as motive on this matter.


Yours truly,

JOHNNY WIZARD


------------------------------------



THE QUEEN'S BENCH

WINNIPEG CENTRE



NOTICE OF MOTION

for the Crown to Stay Proceedings



BETWEEN:



HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN,


and


JOHNNY WIZARD




Accused.



The Validity of the Law

While true, to distribute material in an abusive form of sexually explicit
child pornography, can have a detrimental impact on the impressionable, being
in simple possession, does not connotate the same negative risk to the public
body. It is not a Freedom of Expression issue. All the pictures on my
computer, deleted and otherwise, are not my expressions. Nor, importantly,
can digital images be perceived, until, at least, they are already in your
possession. Under current law, as is in my case, you're already guilty on
nothing. So, if you should see something arguably imprisoning, you're too
late to point fingers elsewhere.

It's analogous to you sitting in your parked car with someone throwing through
the opened window, a closed paper bag of crack cocaine, followed behind by an
arresting police officer, who while cuffing you hears your plead that some
completely unknown person threw the innocuous unmarked bag through the window,
leaving the unjust officer of our law, to reply for the record "Yeah, I saw
the, left to go on his own "stranger" do it. And it's a crime in this country
don't you know to be found in simple possession? Now, where are the keys to
the trunk of this fancy car I'm planning to sell for a tidy profit crack head
loser?"

The Crown appears under this law in my case to have no need to prove a
criminal intent to do her things.

See, under a simple possession charge, there is no allegations of intent to
obtain or distribute something illegal, and likewise, not found a responsible
public's interest in seeking the means of which the criminal content was as
could be LEGALLY distributed. The last thing we want in our dying world is a
setup where private legal businesses are selling, promoting, and releasing
content that only becomes illegal when the exploitation unit comes into your
home under false pretences to steal all your electronic stuff by grossly
misunderstanding what the threat actually is.

A digital image isn't possibly perceived until it is at least, already in your
possession. Making the standing law as it is interpreted by the faulting
Crown, unjust. No criminal intent is alleged by my sole possession charge,
but for by myself against the Crown's secret bushite crew for aiding and
abetting the crimes of first degree mass murder in New York City.

An infraction against the public's interest occurs when such materials are
expressed through distribution. Digital images of people posing as testaments
to the beauty of being human, are not the same as expressions of sexually
exploited children. Yet, from as near as I can tell, the threat of seriously
cruel and inhuman treatment against me with a five year prison sentence is
being made because the Crown has made included, condemnable interpretations of
the public's free expressions of youth and beauty. Again, not my own.
Leaving still no made interest in understanding where these prison term
perceptions, that are often admitted by the Crown's crew to be legal,
originated. If the Crown's case remains standing, why shouldn't we expect the
child exploitation units to then widely distribute as near as can be Barely
Legal materials in hopes to nab more of us as the fearful to be shamed as
criminal through threatened public Court proceedings regarding your alledged
deviant private sexual thoughts? Of legal images perceived as a god honest,
testimony of youth and beauty, being ourselves beautifully youthful, could
leave you too as depicted hiding some unknown something about your unseen
character. Or, an even worse madness, exploitation units distributing truly
illegal depictions, named maybe after car models, to see who could be made
found only in simple possession of