Chicago Indymedia : http://chicago.indymedia.org
Chicago Indymedia

LOCAL News :: Labor : Protest Activity

Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

150,000 Workers March in Chicago’s May Day
Click on image for a larger version

P5010297.JPG
Breaking out of the Loop
P5010025.JPG
Some youth bring a more radical perspective.
P5010047.JPG
Luchador Drum Corps
P5010068.JPG
A great brass-and-drum crew
P5010206.JPG
The only Minuteman to make it
P5010020.JPG
A morning press conference by CAAELII
P5010369.JPG
One of several puppets
In the most recent in a series of national protests for the rights of immigrant workers, Chicagoans organized what was easily the largest May Day march in the country yesterday. This is a second helping of the massive resurgence of International Workers Day in this country, though here protest organizers dubbed it as International Working Families Day to keep their focus on how deportations, raids, and other attacks divide immigrant families. Led by disabled activists in wheelchairs and young children in strollers, the march sent a powerful message of continued resistance and workers solidarity.

An increased concentration on patriotism and families was met by a large concern with raids, including the armed daytime paramilitary actions in Little Village last week. Protesters kept their spirits up, and at one point a series of more than a dozen waves swept a section of tens of thousands of marchers. Rows would all sit down one by one, before standing up with their signs or arms in the air, an amazing activity to watch either from up high or inside.

The focus on U.S. flags and white t-shirts was very apparent, but small pockets took on a different approach, as with several drum circles, including one decked out in Mexican luchador masks, and others backed up by brass sections. These folks felt it was important to bring tradition, dynamism, and flair into a struggle that most of them felt transcended legislation and small reforms. Some, especially among high school-age participants, preferred to cover themselves as a reference to the Zapatistas, or represent Che on t-shirts, flags and banners. But all of this was in the shadow of the much more prevalent attitude of draping people in the symbols of their adopted country.

The Basics

The day began with a more than three hour rally at Union Park, in the heart of a union district full of the headquarters of many of the city’s locals, at ten o’clock in the morning. At half past noon, two feeders from a south side Mexican neighborhood and a north side Puerto Rican neighborhood would march toward this initial rally, and upon their arrival the big march would begin. The main march went a little more than a mile east on Washington to Des Plaines, where the Chicago Federation of Labor’s Haymarket rally fed in, and south on Des Plaines to Jackson. Another turn east on Jackson for a little over a mile took the march to Grant Park for a second three to four hour rally.

By the Numbers

In the middle of the march, pig Commander Ralph Chizewski begins to estimate the crowd around at least thirty to forty thousand, and then fumbles himself up to a total estimate of seventy-five thousand. His estimates are never sharp, and the capitalist news seems to have settles on one hundred and fifty thousand (150,000).

Frustrations

This was perhaps the most patriotic showing yet, worse than some of last year’s increasing tastelessness. The US flags vastly overwhelmed any other flags, with very few Mexican flags and extremely rare red Che flags, red flags and red-and-black flags. One group brought an assortment of national flags from around the world, but their contingent was led by a flag of the Olympics, a sell-out gesture of pride in this city while some Black activists are protesting the very same idea. Much of this was the fruit born of more conservative elements like El Pistolero and other Spanish-language radio show hosts. The flags were complemented by more frequent than usual chants of “U-S-A!” Someone unaware of the date might have thought it was the Fourth of July.

Three feeder marches started in different parts of the city later than last year, when I was able to drop in on what were then two of them. This was an especially poor choice by the Chicago Federation of Labor and other unions that held a rally at the Haymarket statue. Last year they held a smaller rally after the big march, but this year they had publicized a rally there two and a half hours before the march was set to begin, which would have allowed them enough time to march to the initial rallying point of the big march, and allowed folks like myself to participate as well. Only two days before May Day, they contacted their people with the decision that they were moving their Haymarket rally later by another one and a half hours, and would feed into the big march as it passed- missing half of the marching. They did bring out somewhat larger numbers this year, but it was still a feeble effort compared to union strength here.

Finally, the evening before the march, the capitalist news explained that the closing rally point had moved from Daley Plaza (the symbolic heart of the city and the downtown, and surrounding or nearby the city, county, and state government buildings) to Grant Park. Many activists were frustrated by this revelation, but the newspaper the next morning explained it better. The Chicago Tribune accurately reported that the police had made the decision the day before May Day, and the organizers had tried to reject it, holding out for the originally planned Daley Plaza. The police refused to budge, and organizers felt that they had no choice but to give in, though organizer Jorge Mujica was right in the newspapers when he argued it would cause confusion, when thousands of would-be participants showed up at Daley Plaza after the march was supposed to have been over.

Why would Daley Plaza have been better than Grant Park? Firstly, the other two largest demonstrations (both in this movement and in city history) went to Federal Plaza or Grant Park, so the third truly massive march taking people to Daley Plaza would have been different. Daley Plaza offers symbolism, much more visibility, and a greater concentration of protesters. Grant Park lacks all symbolism, is far enough away from pedestrians, traffic and buildings, and in the past many protesters dispersed before reaching the rally, or remained very spread out. Further, while Daley Plaza is surrounded by large buildings, Grant Park offers no respite from the elements, and both a burning sun and strong winds beat down on protesters during that closing rally. Finally, and this can partly be solved by simply shortening the closing rally, the quicker dispersal of protesters meant that musical acts and speakers that were farther back on the roster either went on with a tiny audience or were booted all together.

Also, Daley sucks and shouldn’t have been allowed to speak. He can go to a painful Hell. When I think about smashing the state these days, my first thought is of smashing his stupid nose.

More still to come

I conducted a series of brief interviews with participants, and took many pictures, all of which I will post in coming days. Until then, keep celebrating May Day!
 
 

Add a new comment
Title
Author
  Create a new account
Text Format

Comment

Anti-spam Enter the following number into the box:
To add more detailed comments, or to upload files, see the full comment form.

Comments

Pig Commander Ralph Chizewski & Banality Sputtering Daley

Chizewski is the same pig commander who arrested Andy Thayer when antiwar activists attempted to hold a press conference at Oak and Michigan in 2005. His attempts to undercount come as no surprise.

Also, just before Daley made his big show at Grant Park, his cops refused to allow water distribution to thirsty protesters on the West Side. Interestingly, the Daley sputtered banalities from the podium in the park excluded amnesty, stopping cop raids and deportations.

Two protesters showed up with large Marine Corps flags. This must have been the Killers in Iraq contingent.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

my favorite part was the company that was handing out bottles of Horchata. i'm couldn't have made it through the whole day otherwise
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

I visit here occasionally to tweak the anti-everything crowd, though I should note that I'm 100% behind the sentiment of yesterday's rally and the rights of immigrants.

That said, I thought that this was funny -

"Frustrations
This was perhaps the most patriotic showing yet, worse than some of last year’s increasing tastelessness."

Did it ever occur to you that this might be a sincere expression by the people participating in THEIR OWN march? God forbid they don't obey the fashion guidelines of the college know-it-alls. Wow.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

"In their own words" has a point.

Some of you are reading the message of all those flags far too narrowly.

I doubt many of those carrying them were saying, 'We love US Imperialism!

My guess is the vast majority of those waving the flags were saying, 'Americans, set aside your fears, drop the hypocrisy and live up to your own best democratic ideals!'

Something like that, anyway.

As for Daley, the issue is not whether you like him or even whether he has crimes on his hands, which he does. I heard his speech was pretty good, especially give his record of public speaking.

The issue is whether it helps lead to progressive immigration reform, which, in the end, has to be supported and passed by people like him. Whether it will or not is still an open question, IMHO. We'll see.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

I come to this site to browse and read up on actions/events as well. I, too, fully support the marchers and immigrants rights. And, like the poster above, I'm pretty disappointed by the snotty tone of this article and some of the comments.

This was a march BY immigrants, as a display of their sentiments and frustrations....where do you get off critiquing their decision to wave American flags? Or the guys with the Marine Corps flags....I imagine they were trying to make a point that they had served this country in the military (for better or worse), as do many young men and women who do NOT enjoy the benefits of citizenship, and they undoubtedly wanted to convey the message that they deserve the same rights as US citizens enjoy.

I am far from a flag-waver, I oppose the war in Iraq, I oppose all that "support the troops" yellow-ribbon crap, and I loathe the Bush administration. Personally all that gratuitous patriotic shit turns my stomach. But come on. Who are you to criticize these individuals for how they choose to express themselves? Do you support their right to express themselves, or do you only support their right to express themselves in as much as it meshes with YOUR personal worldview? I have a feeling that for many of them (whether you like it or not), the American flag represents something very different than what it represents to you or me. I can respect that. I will never hang an American flag in front of my house, but I can respect the psychology of an "illegal" Mexican immigrant who does so because s/he genuinely wants to be a citizen in this country and is out on the streets demanding his/her rights. If you can't at least give them that bit of understanding then perhaps you're not quite the ally you think you are.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

the writer, being the son of an immigrant and not in college, is expressing his disdain for the more conservative elements among the organizers who believe in a strategy of Many US Flags- No Other Flags. that isn't spontaneously 'in their own words', it's orchestrated. 'they' have many different opinions and are not monolithic.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

Don't forget that there seems to be attempts to "legitimize" these marches by using American flags. There was alot of criticism by those in the corporate media about the lack of US flags. That may have been a driving factor in the increase of them.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

Okay. I guess I'm glad to see that I'm not alone. I just think that it's funny that radicals/progressives/militants/whatever feel the need to dismiss anything associated with the American flag, even when it's held by people who want to actually be Americans.

I would hate to see this movement co-opted by the aforementioned college know-it-all crowd(regardless of the author's own credentials) just because it too involves walking around and holding signs (and apparently - deep breath - puppets). In any event, I was heartened to see this take place, and that Chicago, a city of immigrants, made such a strong showing.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

The writer doesn't attack the US flags outright, though. (S)he attacks the exclusivity of symbollism organized through a top-down style. Aside for the criticism of El Pistolero, I can attest that aside from the RCP's red flags, the only folks passing out or selling flags has exclusively US flags, as opposed to the previous protests.

The need to legitimize the protest or one's right to be in this country aside, there is still something disorienting about the focus the flag and that chant by some (but not most) of the leadership.
 

in defense of fire

to "in their own words"

"I visit here occasionally to tweak the anti-everything crowd, though I should note that I'm 100% behind the sentiment of yesterday's rally and the rights of immigrants."

Whoa, thanks, I forgot people needed your approval to celebrate Mayday. And we aren't anti-everything, we're just anti-everything you apparently support, or whatever you think we should just "tolerate" or "vote about".

and Carl, "My guess is the vast majority of those waving the flags were saying, 'Americans, set aside your fears, drop the hypocrisy and live up to your own best democratic ideals!"

Maybe you've been living on another planet up until yesterday. If we can even talk about an "America" as some kind of generalized identity of people who identify themselves first as "Americans", one of the first things we would notice is that many of them are profoundly anti-democratic. Listen to them. They mostly trust the police, either don't vote because they don't care about "politics" or do vote because they "do care", buy more shit than anyone could ever need and then either don't care about the environment and the people that died so that they could buy that shit or "do care" and turn off their bathroom lights sometimes to "save energy". They love states, desire repression, work at jobs they hate, and then sometimes one of them just want everyone to "chill out", wants us to remain complicit in the destruction of the earth and the theft of our lives but make sure no one is angry about it.

We know why there were so many American flags at the march. We want the people carrying them to know, though, that the flags they should be carrying are red and black, not red, white, and blue. Nations should not represent them (and cannot anyway), in any context, nor should worker's marches be about anything other than total liberation from bosses and their armed guards, the cops.

"I would hate to see this movement co-opted by the aforementioned college know-it-all crowd"

As if college know-it-alls even come to mayday marches, as if statists like "in their own words" hadn't already co-opted it.

We don't need apologists, vanguardists, or imperialist flags. Its awful that so many of the people getting fucked over by this whole sick empire think that the only way they can look legitimate here is pander to the racists and "patriots" who want them to leave anyway.

For total war on the state
For autonomy and friendship
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

So if I'm understanding you, the following people are excluded from supporting the rights of immigrants:

Vanguardists (to my ears your comments smack of vanguardism, but I certainly don't want to spoilyour fun just yet);
Apologists;
Statists and Imperialists (I'm not sure I know any active, self-defined 'statists' or 'imperialists', but whatever);
Anyone that disagrees with any of your politics;
Anyone that disagrees with you generally;
Patriots (or would-be patriots);
College know-it-alls;
and me.

Good luck with that.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

Hey, you posted a little polemic attacking the integrity of the article writer/photographer, you should expect someone else to post a polemic right back. All's fair in flameiNg war
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

{just for clarification, I am not the first "in their own words" poster...I'm the person who posted the comment after Carl Davidson's}

To finne, who said,
"Its awful that so many of the people getting fucked over by this whole sick empire think that the only way they can look legitimate here is pander to the racists and "patriots" who want them to leave anyway."

Perhaps it's not pandering? Perhaps it's genuine sentiment on their part? I'm not denying what you said about the sick empire fucking people over. But the reality is that for many Mexican immigrants (legal or illegal), the US flag represents something positive. It doesn't for me, but whatever, it was their march, not mine.

I understand what you, and the OP, are getting at. But I think a criticism like the one you're both making would be better coming from within the immigrant community. I am going to go out on a limb and assume that you are a US citizen; assuming that's the case, you enjoy a certain position of privilege in this fucked-up society, whether you like it or not, and you do benefit from it; so it's arrogant for you to be condemning non-citizens asserting their rights for the manner in which they choose to do so.

At any rate it seems trifling to go on about these kinds of details when the real issue is the 12 million undocumented people in this country who deserve some kind of legal status.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

That's fine. I'm not so sure that I was "attacking" the author of the account, but calling out the predictable, corny, boring criticism of radicals generally. Replace "college-know-it-alls" with "militant chic" in the last sentence of the first paragraph and it all stands.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

Finne says, in reply to me:

'Maybe you've been living on another planet up until yesterday. If we can even talk about an "America" as some kind of generalized identity of people who identify themselves first as "Americans", one of the first things we would notice is that many of them are profoundly anti-democratic. Listen to them. They mostly trust the police, either don't vote because they don't care about "politics" or do vote because they "do care", buy more shit than anyone could ever need and then either don't care about the environment and the people that died so that they could buy that shit or "do care" and turn off their bathroom lights sometimes to "save energy". They love states, desire repression, work at jobs they hate, and then sometimes one of them just want everyone to "chill out", wants us to remain complicit in the destruction of the earth and the theft of our lives but make sure no one is angry about it.'

'Finne,' here's a good rule of thumb for organizers:

'Don't let anyone put their head higher than yours, and don't put your head higher than anyone else's.'

Alienation from one's own is often the first step of radicalization.

But understanding that you're no better or worse as a human being, when all is said and done, than those ordinary folks, is often a second step.

Americans have had a split consciousness from day one. Most of my ancestors were Scot-Irish, who settled on the Pa-Ohio frontier from 1760 to 1810. They were fierce democrats as opposed to all kinds of European feudal authority, especially the Brits. They were dirt poor, having lived in prison or holes in the ground, literally, in Ulster, and a log cabin here, all the deer they could shot, and whiskey from corn, was heaven to them.

But a good number of them, not all to be sure, were also among the best Indian killers and slave catchers, even though a good many also shred their blood to end slavery. One of the worse things that happened to them, and a good many others, too, was learning to think they were 'white,' the true secret of their ongoing subjugation to their rulers up to today.

But a rant against 'Americans' full of 'shoulds' and 'oughts' and 'musts' doesn't help you or them.

One conclusion I came to many years ago, was that there wasn't anything special about me, which meant if I could come to understand these things, there wasn't any reason many others couldn't also, especially if I talked to them as one of them.

Of course, some cases are harder than others. As Mao Zedong once put it, 'Everyone can change, but some people die first.'

The task is for the militant minority to find the ways to unite the many to defeat the few. Let's get on with it.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

i spoke to some of the folks with US flags and got different kinds of reponses.

some were very intent on showing their pride in their adopted country and their faith in the alleged ideals of this country. there was real sincerity.

others spoke of it as a way to legitimate themselves despite whatever they actually felt about this country. these folks might have been reluctant to say this to someone oustide of la raza, because they are afraid of bigotry.

it is a feeling that we must try at all costs to legitimize ourselves as 'normal.' a feeling that we cannot have too much traditional culture or political diversity revealed, or else we give ammo to the despicable bigots who attack us, like the Minutemen, Lou Dobbs, or Johnny Racist-on-the-street.

there is nothing wrong with critiqueing this point of view, though it is probably the prevailing one.
 

Re: Initial Account of 150,000-worker May Day 2007

I think the biggest problem was not the overabundance of US flags, but the near absence or token presence of other immigrant communities, as well as the near absence of working class whites and Blacks whose families have been here for generations. Widening the movement and the struggle is a much bigger issue than the flags.
 

出会い

出会い出会い出会い系サイト出会い喫茶出会い掲示板ナンパ出会いカフェ人妻出会い無料系サイト優良出会い系攻略完全無料。アダルトビデオアダルト動画アダルトアニメアダルト画像アダルトサイト無料DVDアダルト風俗サンプル無料風俗優良アダルトサイト比較海外。人妻画像人妻パラダイス知合い人妻援護会人妻SMコレクション風俗告白。熟女画像東京熟女掲示板動画熟女ビデオおまんこオナニーエロ画像エロフラッシュアニメエロ動画エロゲームエロ漫画無料エロサイト。エッチ画像エッチ動画エッチ小説写真エッチアニメエッチ0930。セックスアナルセックス画像セックス動画カーセックスセックスフレンドスワッピングSEX写真セックスボランティセックス体位東京セックス仕方SEX。おっぱい画像おっぱい村長おっぱい楽園掲示板おっぱい命おっぱいゲーム。巨乳動画巨乳画像アイドル巨乳掲示板風俗。セフレ募集セフレ掲示板セフレ画像掲示板セフレの作り方出会い無料素人セフレ。童貞狩りエロ漫画童貞狩り童貞喪失童貞オークション素人童貞逆援不倫パートナー不倫出会い人妻不倫
 
Donate

Views

Account Login

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software