It's no wonder, then, that news of Elvira's heroic defiance of the government's deportation order has spread through the US immigrant communities like wildfire, or that she is compared with Rosa Parks, whose civil disobedience of the unjust Jim Crow segregation laws in 1955 sparked a year-long boycott by working-class black women of the Montgomery, Alabama buses, bringing the city's transit system to its knees and igniting the struggle for black civil rights nationwide.
The Case of Elvira Arellano
by Fred Bergen
f_red_bergen (at) yahoo.com
August 20, 2006
Who is Elvira?
Within one week, Elvira Arellano, a former aircraft cleaner at Chicago's O'Hare airport, has become a symbol and rallying point in the struggle against the racist regime of terror and persecution against immigrants. Elvira, a 31 year old Mexican woman and mother of Saul, 7 years old, first came to the United States in 1997, but was arrested and deported to Mexico. She returned the same year, living in Oregon and then moving to Chicago in 2000, where she got a job at O'Hare.
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks provided the "homeland security" pretext for a racist, union-busting campaign within the United States, just as they gave the government the opportunity it needed to launch its wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. Elvira was caught in a federal raid on the workers at O'Hare airport, accused of working with a false social security number, fired from her job, and ordered deported to Mexico.
But Elvira has refused to go quietly. She helped to found United Latino Family, a reform group that opposes the the government's inhumane breaking up of families in the course of deportations, in 2002 after she was fired from O'Hare. La Familia Latina Unida organized, and Elvira took part in, a hunger strike starting last mother's day, May 10, to draw attention to the suffering of "mixed-status" families that are broken up by deportations and raids. Determined to remain in the US with her son, she refused the summons to an immigration court on Tuesday, August 8. The federal authorities issued a warrant for her arrest, and on August 15, she sought refuge in the Adalberto United Methodist church in the mainly Puerto Rican Chicago neighborhood of Humboldt Park.
A case of political persecution, and a racist attack against all immigrants and all workers
Across the US, an estimated eleven million undocumented immigrant workers struggle for existence on the margins of society, using false social security numbers or other precarious arrangements to get low-paying jobs. If they were to stop work, either through a strike or through firings and deportations on a truly comprehensive scale, it would paralyze major US industries, and the effects on the US economy would be catastrophic. The impressive effect of the strike on May Day, 2006, which shut down major corporations and agricultural regions for the day, only hinted at the tremendous social power of latin@ and other immigrant workers, chiefly because the May Day effort was boycotted by the cowardly and treacherous union bureaucrats and their allies in the immigrants' rights movement.
The problems with Elvira's social security number and immigration status were an excuse to isolate a woman who had become a union activist at the airport, and a spokesperson for the immigrants' rights movement, involved in the union-sponsored "Immigrant Workers Freedom Ride" of 2003, just as "Homeland Security" after the September 11 attacks has been a pretext for an official government campaign to discipline the US working class into accepting the roll-back their union and democratic rights that US banks and businesses need to impose in order to compete with their imperialist rivals in Europe and Japan.
A symbol of resistance against the migra's racist reign of terror
In March of 2004, the Bureau of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (BICE), the new name for the Immigration and Naturalization Service after it was reorganized as part of the Department of Homeland Security, published its "Operation Endgame" strategy, the government bureaucrat's chilling vision of a "final solution" for estimated the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in the US. "We must strive for a 100% removal rate", declares the BICE's Director of Removal, Anthony Tangeman, in the cover memo of the Endgame report.
By the year 2001, there were an estimated 20,000 undocumented immigrants detained by the US government. After the 2001 terrorist attacks and the merging of the INS into Homeland Security, immigration hearings were closed to the public, and immigrants are now allowed to be jailed indefinitely without charges in "emergency" situations. The ICE's Office of Detention and Removal reports that it imprisoned 230,000 people in its 2003 fiscal year, and deported over 140,000 people. And the government is planning ahead: the National Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 calls for the construction of four new immigration prisons capable of holding 40,000 more inmates. Victims of racial profiling by cops at traffic stops have their immigration status checked as a humiliating matter of routine, deportations by the immigration authorities have risen to 383 per day, and the militarization of border patrols initiated by President Clinton's "Operation Gatekeeper" in 1994 has caused the completely avoidable deaths of 3,000 immigrants, who risk exposure to the harsh desert environment of the US southwest, and persecution by vigilante gangs of racist maniacs like the Minutemen, in order to cross the border into the US.
It's no wonder, then, that news of Elvira's heroic defiance of the government's deportation order has spread through the US immigrant communities like wildfire, or that she is compared with Rosa Parks, whose civil disobedience of the unjust Jim Crow segregation laws in 1955 sparked a year-long boycott by working-class black women of the Montgomery, Alabama buses, bringing the city's transit system to its knees and igniting the struggle for black civil rights nationwide.
Once again, the Democrats show that they are enemies of the workers
The response to the government's bipartisan anti-immigrant campaign by the union bureaucrats and reformist organizations that largely boycotted the May 1 strike for immigrants rights has been to cynically try to round up the votes of immigrants and their supporters for the same Democratic politicians who have been calling for raids, round-ups, and deportations of immigrants. The reformist March 10 coalition in Chicago, naively seen by many as a "progressive" element in the immigrants' rights movement even though it refused to endorse the May 1 strike, proposes that defenders of Elvira Arellano call and fax Illinois senators Barack Obama and Richard Durbin, both Democrats, and ask them to pass legislation specifically granting amnesty to Elvira. Furthermore, the legislation would reduce the quota of allowed visas from Mexico by one person, to "allow" for Elvira! In other words, while Elvira clearly wants to use her case to rally the movement for immigrants rights, her reformist "supporters" want to disarm the popular outrage that has been generated by her case without changing the racist law one bit! The reformists are not even promoting a reform: they are shamelessly protecting the racist status quo.
For their part, the heartless, racist Democrats have turned the reformists' demand for "comprehensive immigration reform", formulated so as to mean absolutely nothing and offend not a single capitalist politician, against Elvira and the immigration reformers who are campaigning to defend her! Exuding well-practiced political hypocrisy, senator Durbin washed his hands of Elvira's fate by declaring, "It is an unfortunate truth that scores of people are in the same situation as Elvira and her family. We cannot fix the injustices of this system with private bills; only comprehensive immigration reform can permanently remedy this situation."
This is the party that the labor bureaucrats and immigration reformists will be campaigning for in the coming election. No amount of prayer vigils, lobbying, or marches for reform will change the fact that the Democrats are a party of the capitalist class, a class that will stop at nothing to maintain the system of racist oppression that provides them with a politically confused, divided working class that is ready for the most intensive exploitation. Do the reformers really think that the same politicians who regularly sign off on billion-dollar war budgets, without flinching at atrocities from the rape of Fallujah to the torture chambers at Abu Ghraib, Bagram air base, and Guantanamo bay, will make an exception for Elvira if enough people call their offices?
The workers can turn back the racist attack
As Working Class Emancipation said in its leaflet for the emergency demonstration on Monday, Aug. 21 to defend Elvira Arellano, "Only the massive, independent, and united action of the working class can stop the 21st century slave-catchers of the migra from terrorizing our immigrant sisters and brothers." The May 1 strike showed that the working class, because it has the power to paralyze every industry by withdrawing its labor, can make the bosses pay an unbearable price for their oppressive regime.
Already, the government agents are showing signs that they fear an explosion of outrage if they raid the Adalberto church to kidnap Elvira. On August 18, the major media reported unnamed immigration officials who denied that they had plans to raid the church. Although we should not give the same lying federal cops who assassinated Black Panther Party leader Fred Hampton in his sleep in 1969 in Chicago an ounce of credibility, the government's false "reassurance" that they intend to treat Elvira Arellano just like the half million other immigrants who they persecute points out both that they are recoiling in fear at the potency of Elvira's resistance, and that the immigrants' rights movement, if it is to succeed, must break with the reformists and the capitalist parties and carry out the struggle for full citizenship rights for all immigrants to its only possible solution: a massive working class-led revolt to bring down the racist regime of the exploiters and oppressors, expropriate the banks and industries that are the source of their power, and build a society that respects the democratic rights of all people.
Comments
Labor Fakers "USA" Chant Didn't Take Hold
21 Aug 2006
At an August 20 support rally some audience members carried small US terror banners (that's Old Gory), and one labor supporter sported a large US flag. But when some labor supporters of Elvira attempted to close-out the rally with the USA! USA! chant, it flopped. Many crowd members were noticeably silent and some vocally protested the reactionary patriotism that attempts to brake the immigrant movement from its forward advance.
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
21 Aug 2006
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
25 Aug 2006
Mexicans have a legal way to get into the U.S. If someone is here illegally, that is their decision and should be treated like other illegal activities. Parents and children are separated all the time because the parents did something illegal and were not responsible for their children. Think: DCFS.
I know that getting into the U.S. legally is an arduous process. So what? I've done the mountains of paperwork to get legal in another country before and is it daunting. But it's also do-able.
Unfortunately, Elvira closed a door when she took an illegal SS number. She now cannot apply for legal citizenship. She was irresponsible and is now facing the consequences.
As for all the illegal underpaid Mexican workers here in the U.S. you are telling us we need to take in and feel compassionate for - why don't we help the legal poor that are here in the U.S. before helping illegals? We have enough plight here without adding to it. Fix our backyard before helping someone fix theirs.
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
06 Jul 2007
document which is a felony. She will never became
a legal citizens. She must be deported. I just
can't understand why she has not deported and even able to threaten the US gov't. This is simply amazing how corrupted America is. If America is a lawful country, this Mexican criminal must be force to deported it. They have to use a police force to take her out from a church and throw into bus and drive to mexican border and drop there. What is the justice in this nation?
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
06 Jul 2007
This 'lawful' country stole half of Mexico in a war fought mainly to expand the number of slave states, at Mexico's expense, because Mexico had abolished slavery before us. So let the hot air out of that pompous balloon, and think things through more seriously.
Immigration of labor is an economic problem rooted in North-South inequality, and requires an economic solution that strikes at that root. Without that, your position is so much talk radio demagogy.
As for the initial post, calling for a mass workers revolt, if the authors wanted to write something more useful, they'd do an analysis of the lay of the land. Where do American workers actually stand on the issues here, not where you think they ought to stand? Where does the Black community stand?
These class and popular forces are critical engines of change, and if we have an accurate picture of exactly how they're divided, or not, then we can see what we have to do in charting a path forward, other than simply denouncing Democrats, which, if a bloc of workers oppose the rights of immigrants, may actually be rendering some back-handed support for those you wouldn't want to endorse otherwise.
But in the meantime, Elvira and others like her have taken the moral high ground and challenged us all, whatever our views, to lend a hand. Let's get on with it.
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
06 Jul 2007
"This 'lawful' country stole half of Mexico in a war fought mainly to expand the number of slave states, at Mexico's expense"
That's not regular bullshit, Charly. That's an elephant-portion! Mexico attacked Texas. And the USA intervened to defend Texas. So Carlitos, like I say to my chavos in the barrio: que te den por el culo, viejo cagon!
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
You're begging the question.
One main reason Anglos in Northern Mexico rebelled against Mexico to secede and establish Texas as an independent state was slavery. The Mexicans, who were abolitionists, had just cause to attack them, unless you're one of the sham 'patriots' who support the Confederacy over the Union. The Lone Star Republic allowed slavery, when Mexico didn't, and when it became part of the US, it was a slave state that rebelled against the US to form the Confederate slavocracy. From Wikipedia:
'The first Texas provisional government was formed at San Felipe de Austin on November 7, 1835. This council passed a declaration of support for the 1824 Mexican constitution, and appointed a governor and other officials, though it stopped short of declaring Texan independence. The first declaration of independence for modern Texas, by both Anglo-Texian settlers and local Tejanos, was signed in Goliad on December 20, 1835. The Convention of 1836 was convened at Washington-on-the-Brazos with Richard Ellis presiding, and the Texas Declaration of Independence was enacted on March 2, 1836, effectively creating the Republic of Texas.
'Four days later, the thirteen-day Siege of the Alamo ended as Mexican General Antonio López de Santa Anna's forces defeated the Alamo's approximately 183 defenders (the estimate of 183 is disputed, as a number of people appear to have been excluded from the list; experts say it is likely that the defenders from many U.S. states together with those of direct Mexican descent totaled over 200[citation needed]). The Alamo was outside the then-sleepy town that would eventually become the center of the city of San Antonio. Remember the Alamo! became the battle cry of the Texas Revolution that most remember, but in fact this was a shortened version of the actual cry, which was "Remember the Alamo, Remember Goliad". At Goliad, Santa Anna had Colonel James Fannin and 341 of his men—who had surrendered at the Battle of Coleto—marched one mile out of town and massacred.
'The Battle of San Jacinto was fought on April 21, 1836, near the present-day city of Houston. General Santa Anna commanded a force of 1,600 men, of which more than 600 were killed and the rest captured by Texas General Sam Houston's army of 800 Texians, while only nine Texians died. Santa Anna was captured the next day dressed as a poor Mexican peasant. During this battle Sam Houston was wounded in the leg, but would recover. Houston also lost control of his men as anger over the Alamo and Goliad overcame his troops; they showed no mercy for those 18 minutes it took to destroy Santa Anna's army. Houston, however, spared Santa Anna's life, and forced him to sign letters to his two remaining armies instructing them to leave Texas. This decisive battle resulted in Texas's independence from Mexico. With a population of 30,000 Anglo-American Texians, 5,000 African-Americans (most of them slaves; something which had been a point of contention as slavery had already been fully abolished under Mexican law) and 3,470 Hispanic Tejanos, this was quite an accomplishment even with the approximately 14,200 Native Americans, mostly Comanche, staying out of the war....
'On February 28, 1845, the U.S. Congress passed a bill that would authorize the United States to annex the Republic of Texas. On March 1 U.S. President John Tyler signed the bill. The legislation set the date for annexation for December 29 of the same year. On October 13 of the same year, a majority of voters in the Republic approved a proposed constitution that specifically endorsed slavery and the slave trade. This constitution was later accepted by the U.S. Congress, making Texas a U.S. state on the same day annexation took effect, December 29, 1845 (therefore bypassing a territorial phase)[1]. One of the primary motivations for annexation was that the Texas government had incurred huge debts which the United States agreed to assume upon annexation. In 1852, in return for this assumption of debt, a large portion of Texas-claimed territory, now parts of Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Wyoming, was ceded to the Federal government.'
You must have watched too many Davy Crockett movies as a kid.
Now, what was your point about a 'lawful' nation?
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
Perhaps to many of the Anglos who, even if they didn't hold slaves themselves, went along with it.
But certainly not to the 5000 or so slaves in what became Texas, not to mention the Mexican Tejanos and Comanche. If Texas had remained part of Mexico, they would have be free, at least free in their person and free to sell their labor or buy land.
I guess a reading of history depends a little on who you decide to cast your lot with. The 'white blindspot' emerges here, don't you think?
Masochist Gringo? I've been called many things over the years, but this is a new one! Considering the issue, I think I'll plead 'guilty as charged.'
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
07 Jul 2007
Along with being an internationalist, I'm a Woody Guthrie patriot of sorts. My folks have been here early on--one Grandfather in Miles Standish's miltia at Plymouth Colony, seven in the Revolutionary War, two great uncles signed the Declaration of Independence, and died for it, dozens who spilled their blood against the slavocracy. But hardly any were 'upper crust.' Plenty of uncles, aunts and cousins fought union battles in the 1930s, and some died in Western PA's steel mills, including my grandfather, before the unions made them a little safer, at least. All of them were immigrants, and when capital dragged some of them here to those mines and mills, they didn't give a damn whether they had papers or not.
No, I've got roots and blood in this soil, but I appreciate that the roots of Blacks, Native peoples and those descended from the Spaniards go even deeper, whatever 'laws' our robber baron rulers came up with to justify theft. I appreciate my country's strengths and its weaknesses, and I keep my shoulder to the wheel to have it a better place when I leave this life than when I entered it.
So, as they say where I come from, take your crappy insults and put them where the sun doesn't shine.
But if you want an honest discussion of ideas, please continue.
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
08 Jul 2007
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
20 Aug 2007
"Within one week, Elvira Arellano, a former aircraft cleaner at Chicago's O'Hare airport, has become a symbol and rallying point in the struggle against the racist regime of terror and persecution against immigrants."
If you believe that enforcing immigration laws is racist, then you must also believe that looking for males in rape cases is sexist. I dare you to disagree with this.
Elvira, a 31 year old Mexican woman and mother of Saul, 7 years old, first came to the United States in 1997,
“came”??!! She just ‘came’ to the United States. Way to ignore the whole illegal aspect.
Again, that's as far as I got because the rest is based on a false or disguised premise.
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
20 Aug 2007
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
21 Aug 2007
Man. Are you intentionally trying to be funny?
Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
23 Aug 2007
Re: Re: The Case of Elvira Arellano
23 Aug 2007
Let's cram as many of the worlds poor into this country as we can. The more varied the cultures the better....
Get a grip on reality you fucking tool...........
出会い
25 Mar 2008