LOCAL News :: Civil & Human Rights : Crime & Police : International Relations : Peace : Protest Activity
Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
A lawsuit on behalf of more than 800 people at a March 20, 2003 protest against the war in Iraq was awarded class-action status.
On April 17, 2006, Judge Kendall ruled that class certification has been granted on all the March 20th cases.
More than 800 people were detained and arrested after some 17,000 protesters marched on Chicago's famed Lake Shore Drive in downtown Chicago, in response to the formal launch of the 2003 War against Iraq.
The march expected to proceed from Lake Shore Drive down Michigan Avenue, until a massive show of police force blocked the progress of the protest at Michigan and Oak. Police then reacted with violence, physically beating many march participants, and arresting and detaining hundreds of protesters and passers-by.
Repeated annual attempts to complete the march down Michigan avenue on the anniversary of the war and the Lake Shore Drive protest succeeded in 2006, when more than 10,000 protesters marched in the Festival of Rights parade.
The lawyers on behalf of the March 20 detainees and arrestees are now discussing how to proceed.
A press conference after the announcement was held on April 17 at 11 am at the Fed. bldg. at 219 S. Dearborn.
Comments
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
18 Apr 2006
if youre not in it, but were arrested/detained and beaten that day in the protest, is it too late to join it?
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
18 Apr 2006
www.nlgchiago.org
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
19 Apr 2006
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
19 Apr 2006
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
20 Apr 2006
Question #1 - Give me the name, address, phone number, and place of employment for everyone you've ever met that has attended a meeting or protest....
I'm not saying don't join, by all means do, but realize what you're getting into.
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
20 Apr 2006
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
20 Apr 2006
An official notice will be sent out to as many class members as possible in the near future. The National Lawyers Guild attorneys working on the case, Jim Fennerty, Janine Hoft, Joey Mogul and Melinda Power are attempting to compile a comprehensive list of the names and contact information of all people who fit into these three sub-classes. The police recorded the names of all those they took into custody but the attorneys are also trying to identify as many people as possible who were only detained on the street. So far, they have identified 278 people who were taken into custody and charged, 218 people who were released without charges and 119 who were prevented from leaving the area for a period of time. It is important to identify as many people as possible in order to hold the police fully accountable for their unlawful actions. Any class member who previously contacted us, but has since changed their contact information, should provide us with their updated information. Also, it is not too late for people who were detained or arrested that night to contact the legal team, if they have not previously done so.
If you have any questions about the case, or would like to inform us of your status in one of the three sub-classes, please contact Brad Thomson, a paralegal working on the case. He can be reached at (773)235-0070 ext. 123 or at BThomson414 (at) aol.com. You can also update your contact information by e-mailing Cheryl Angellaccio at cherylahere (at) yahoo.com.
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
22 Apr 2006
As for the type of questions they would ask, maybe an attorney or paralegal can help here, but I seriously doubt your legal counsel would let you answer a question like the one 'Anon' claims the defense would ask (name names of people at peace group meetings). And I am presuming that anyone not experienced with depositions would not allow themselves to be deposed without representation (that's what I plan to do if called). Asking about all of your free associations with other peace actiivists, unrelated to the events of M20, sounds like a 1st Amendment violation, and maybe could also be attacked on the gound that it isn't relevant to the lawsuit.
What they can and can't ask you at a deposition is a good question, and maybe someone from the M20 team can comment on that (to either put people in the class at ease, or prepare them for the worst).
Re: Case for March 20, 2003 detainees / arrestees wins class-action status
24 Apr 2006
i remember one of the toughest things about being arrested that day was having to sit in jail for 12+ hours and then having to go directly to a wedding to make a best man speech. i think that was the most political best man toasts in a long time.
thanks again.