LOCAL News :: Crime & Police
Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
Lead cop defendant claimed to have never met victim despite being picked out of a line-up and listed as the arresting officer on the arrest report.

CHICAGO, Ill., August 12 – Following a four day trial in federal court, a jury at 7 pm last night found the Chicago Police Department and Officer Richard Defelice guilty of police brutality in the 1999 beating of 32-year-old Rockford resident Jeremy Kunz. Mr. Kunz was represented by the civil rights law firm of Loevy & Loevy.
Jurors awarded Mr. Kunz a total of $275,000, of which $25,000 was for compensatory damages and $250,000 for punitive damages.
"The jury was outraged by the lies told by the police," said Kunz’s attorney, Jon Loevy. “The police denied everything. Six police eyewitnesses claimed to have been not watching when the beating occurred. The lead police interrogator claimed to never have met Mr. Kunz, and yet he was listed on the Department’s own police report as the arresting officer, and Mr. Kunz picked him out in a line-up. Chicago officers tried to use the ‘code of silence’ to deny justice, and it’s to the credit of this jury that the police didn’t get away with it.”
On March 22, 1999 police began following Mr. Kunz, who was driving a stolen Chevy Blazer. Because he was carrying illegal drugs, Kunz did not pull over and eventually got out of the car and ran from the police, who chased him into a parking lot where they caught him. After placing Kunz under arrest, police handcuffed him with his face down on the ground, and proceeded to beat him, kicking him in the head and face, and breaking a rib.
Police then dragged Kunz out of the parking lot, took him to a police interrogation room at the 23rd District police station at Addison and Halsted Streets, and beat a confession out of him. He was punched a number of times in the face until he confessed to knowing that the Blazer was stolen.
When police took Kunz to court two days later, the judge was "very disturbed" by the appearance of Kunz's face and ordered photographs taken. Those photographs (plus the booking photo) were the key physical evidence in the case. Despite his repeated requests, police denied Kunz medical care for 18 hours after their attack on him. He subsequently was hospitalized twice and treated for a broken rib.
Jeremy Kunz is currently 32 years old. He grew up in Rockford, is a former musician with an album on Island Records, a major label. He is now in school.
# # #

Comments
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
12 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
12 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
12 Aug 2005
This thief and drugdealer deserved the beating. In Latin America this guy would have been lynched by civilians.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
12 Aug 2005
Brutal cops not disciplined, fired or fined? Thank (Police Supt) Phil Cline!
Richard Daley and his buddies have got a LOT more to answer for than just ripping off the rest of us.
Alfredo, You Are a Fool
13 Aug 2005
A Latino who identifies with gringo lynch rule is a fool.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
13 Aug 2005
You are a whitey posing as a latino.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
15 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
15 Aug 2005
Me, I'm much more concerned about government employees who beat people bloody than I am about guys who steal SUVs and deal drugs. A guy who steals SUVs and deals drugs can do only so much harm.
A government which breaks the law is the most dangerous creature on the planet.
John Wayne Gacy killed, what, 32 innocent people?
George Bush kills that many innocent people in a good month.
Who's more dangerous -- the serial killer, or the President?
Who's more dangerous -- the small-time criminal, or law-breaking police?
Seems obvious to me. . .
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
16 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
16 Aug 2005
But it's quite another for agents of the state to be beating people for no good reason. We haven't given the state that power, so the police officers compounded the criminality by breaking the law themselves.
Don't campare actions by citizens with actions by state agents -- that's comparing apples to oranges.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
16 Aug 2005
I'm not condoning the actions of the police, and I think they should be held accountable, but I doubt that they just jumped this guy at random. I suspect there's more to the story than just this gruesome photograph, but once again, indymedia can't be bothered to tell it.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
16 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
16 Aug 2005
Whatever excuse the police came up with, the jury didn't buy it.
As to why they did it, I suspect they got carried away, freaked out, and wailed on this guy for no good reason. That happens some times. In fact, it happens all too often.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
So heres a message for the person calling themselves "so" you are not welcome on this website, your views are reactionary and you are intentionally trying to divide the Left between Caucasians and those who are Oriental, Latino, African-American etc. Lets not be so offensive. Heck you might even be a fed for all I know.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Not that I particularly care about it, but the term "Oriental" isn't politically correct enough for a good Leftist.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Let's see... if I stole a car and carried drugs, then I would deserve a proper beating. Nevertheless, I don't steal and I don't deal drugs. But yeah, if a cop beat me, a law-abiding citizen, up then I would sue him. But that scenario is very unlikely because I have an excellent rapport with the authorities.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
And why would a cop assault or torture me?
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
I don't go to protests. In fact, you won't ever see me hanging out or loitering along unruly Leftists causing trouble. Or for that matter, unruly Libertarians or Conservatives (if there are any).
But, yeah, a cop shouldn't harass or physically intimidate peaceful, law-abiding citizens.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
'But, yeah, a cop shouldn't harass or physically intimidate peaceful, law-abiding citizens.'
Good. We agree civil society should be civil.
But Kurt also says:
'Let's see... if I stole a car and carried drugs, then I would deserve a proper beating.'
Now this is rather odd of a libertarian. You might say the thief or dope dealer would be understandably subject to violent retaliation from the car's owner or the father of the kid who got drugs from him.
Understandable, but not necessarily justified. That's why we have civil authorities, so people don't have to mete out 'street justice.' Instead, the civil authorities' task is to arrest the suspect and, if the facts warrant it, bring him to a court of law to decide his innocence or guilt and appropriate punishment.
Your notion that cops should mete out on-the-spot 'street justice' in the form of beatings and worse is costing the city quite a few bucks these days from the taxpayers coffers, funds that justifiably go to the victims of police vigilatism and their attorneys.
Do you really want to argue for more of it? If so, how do you square the the circle with your libertarians views?
Or are you just indulging in a bit of macho, politically incorrect, and chauvinist bluster?
I could even empathize a little with that. I'm no angel. I indulge in it myself -- for about five minutes --every time I go to use my car and find the battery stolen, and I start ranting about 'shoot 'em all, let god sort 'em out!' But then I take a deep breath or two, ponder the impermance of all things in the universe, and let it go. It's too heavy a burden on your karma, let alone a decent guide for public polcy.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Of course I am against cops (or mobs) beating the living shit out of a suspect. Lock'em up for a while. Nevertheless, I occasionally drop a few scandalous comments in a discussion, just to spice it up a notch. Anyway, the cops shouldn't have beaten up the guy, and there must be some sort of punishment for them. A warning at the most, because - let's face it - they actually beat up a thief and drug-dealer that most likely threatened them.
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
18 Aug 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
13 Sep 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
24 Sep 2005
Best Wishes,
Nat
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
17 Oct 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
28 Nov 2005
Re: Federal Jury Finds Chicago Cops Guilty in Beating Case
30 Dec 2005
出会ã„
25 Mar 2008