Let's see, Obama says he would send troops into another country without permission of that country's government. By what twisted definition is that not an "invasion"? And I just love how you have so much faith in his belief in "actionable intelligence." Yeah, we've seen where the CIA's "actionable intelligence" has gotten us over the years, and not just in Iraq. I thought "faith-based" governance or "intelligence" was supposed to be only a Republican ideal.
Obama's threats to invade Pakistan, and a couple years ago, bomb Iran, position him right in line with the nastiest of the neo-cons. His voting for all but one of the Iraq war spending bills confirms the hawkish rhetoric. The only good thing about Obama's macho foreign policy statements are that they expose the phoney "peacenik" as being as much a defender of American empire as his Republican (and Democratic) rivals. That resume ingredient is essential to raking in the millions in corporate money necessary to run a credible campaign for president, and many lesser offices besides.
Dear "Anonymous"
07 Aug 2007
Date Edited: 07 Aug 2007 09:49:42 PM
Obama's threats to invade Pakistan, and a couple years ago, bomb Iran, position him right in line with the nastiest of the neo-cons. His voting for all but one of the Iraq war spending bills confirms the hawkish rhetoric. The only good thing about Obama's macho foreign policy statements are that they expose the phoney "peacenik" as being as much a defender of American empire as his Republican (and Democratic) rivals. That resume ingredient is essential to raking in the millions in corporate money necessary to run a credible campaign for president, and many lesser offices besides.