What are you to do about the all of the contradictions to that post which you provided previously?
This is just one of your quotes: "I favor a relatively open immigration as proposed by the pro-business wing of the GOP." Did you forget already? Are you sure that you are not American? You certainly don't have much of a memory.
But then you call for cracking down on the borders and kicking out single moms. It does not matter which country you are from, you still refuse to address the issue of NAFTA, you refuse to address these issues, you concede the argument by this inaction. You are likely ignorant of the issue since you refuse to address them. Why do you attempt to continue to argue the point if you are unaware of them?
I'm an atheist myself, but I could not justify ridiculing my fellow citizens by belittling their beliefs. You claim those issues are about religion and not melanin. Regardless, these are realities that are closely related tom Mexican Culture, you ridicule Mexican figures and customs in your disrespectful references to the saint and the custom of siestas, and that is in the very least insensitive, and just perceived by most as racist. If you were a Mexican person, that would be one thing, but it's highly unlikely that you are. Although you may claim to be now since it would serve to help your pathetic attempt at being credible in your criticisms.
I am an American, I am born and raised in the States, I've lived side by side with Mexican people my whole life. I'm very proud of that relationship, and if you have a problem with it, you are the one who needs to leave, not Elvira. She has far more legitimacy in this land than you do, that is for damn sure.
If you are so offended by the friendship that we Americans have with our Mexican neighbors, why don't YOU leave? You jackass.
I reiterate. You still avoid my original questions to you about NAFTA. This avoidance, again, proves your ignorance. You are obviously a buffoon, but I am glad that you provide the opportunity to show you for what you really are, and to provide a clear deliniation of our respective identities.
I am very proud to not share your classification.
I realize at this point that it is in your interest to avoid all of the valid points I'm making in these posts, and that in ignoring them you continue the tradition of the right wing ignorance, and that you will deny your previously pronounced associations for the sake of trying to be perceived as valid, and that you will accuse me of ridiculing you even though it is YOU who refuse to be honest about your position, obviously; regardless of all of that, I want to make clear to you and to express that you are a creepy little weasel, a jackass, and a coward, and that it is your actions and ignorance that have served to effectively destroy my country, and certainly not my actions, and even more certainly not Elvira's.
Yes, I am ridiculing you and calling you names, what else should I do to a person who makes claims that they cannot back up, and shows no interest in trying to understand an issue that they want to speak about and ridicule others about.
Re: Local immigrants' rights activist faces deportation; turns to refuge in church
20 Aug 2006
Date Edited: 20 Aug 2006 06:10:57 PM
This is just one of your quotes: "I favor a relatively open immigration as proposed by the pro-business wing of the GOP." Did you forget already? Are you sure that you are not American? You certainly don't have much of a memory.
But then you call for cracking down on the borders and kicking out single moms. It does not matter which country you are from, you still refuse to address the issue of NAFTA, you refuse to address these issues, you concede the argument by this inaction. You are likely ignorant of the issue since you refuse to address them. Why do you attempt to continue to argue the point if you are unaware of them?
I'm an atheist myself, but I could not justify ridiculing my fellow citizens by belittling their beliefs. You claim those issues are about religion and not melanin. Regardless, these are realities that are closely related tom Mexican Culture, you ridicule Mexican figures and customs in your disrespectful references to the saint and the custom of siestas, and that is in the very least insensitive, and just perceived by most as racist. If you were a Mexican person, that would be one thing, but it's highly unlikely that you are. Although you may claim to be now since it would serve to help your pathetic attempt at being credible in your criticisms.
I am an American, I am born and raised in the States, I've lived side by side with Mexican people my whole life. I'm very proud of that relationship, and if you have a problem with it, you are the one who needs to leave, not Elvira. She has far more legitimacy in this land than you do, that is for damn sure.
If you are so offended by the friendship that we Americans have with our Mexican neighbors, why don't YOU leave? You jackass.
I reiterate. You still avoid my original questions to you about NAFTA. This avoidance, again, proves your ignorance. You are obviously a buffoon, but I am glad that you provide the opportunity to show you for what you really are, and to provide a clear deliniation of our respective identities.
I am very proud to not share your classification.
I realize at this point that it is in your interest to avoid all of the valid points I'm making in these posts, and that in ignoring them you continue the tradition of the right wing ignorance, and that you will deny your previously pronounced associations for the sake of trying to be perceived as valid, and that you will accuse me of ridiculing you even though it is YOU who refuse to be honest about your position, obviously; regardless of all of that, I want to make clear to you and to express that you are a creepy little weasel, a jackass, and a coward, and that it is your actions and ignorance that have served to effectively destroy my country, and certainly not my actions, and even more certainly not Elvira's.
Yes, I am ridiculing you and calling you names, what else should I do to a person who makes claims that they cannot back up, and shows no interest in trying to understand an issue that they want to speak about and ridicule others about.
Please go back to hell now.