Chicago Indymedia : http://chicago.indymedia.org/archive
Chicago Indymedia

News :: Children & Education

the jesus of history and the gospel lie

i solved the 2000 real old quest for the historical jesus,i think
wanna find the real jesus?read flavius josephus' jewish war and me.

here i proved,based on authors cascioli and eisenman,that the gospel jesus is a lie.

and that simon bar jair leader of the jewish resistance fighters during the 66-70 AD antiroman war gave the gospel fabricators the story they transmogrified into "jesus" ' resurrection.

but now i shall demonstrate how the gospel lie stems from the by the gospels skewed and twisted story of a second character in the same war:
jesus ben saffia,also portrayed by flavius josephus in his book jewish war which is the underlying basis for the gospel liars.

so it will become clear that the false gospel jesus was the remix of both simon ben jair (simon peter) and jesus ben saffia.

this is the simon link:
arizona.indymedia.org/news/2005/08/29811.php

The first occurrence of jesus ben saffia is as a jesus ben saffa at II,20,4,566 in the jewish war (bellum iudaicum).

we are in the context of the 66-73 AD war by which militant jews tried desperately and in vain to regain their independence from the romans,hoping god would send a messiah down the clouds that would lead them to victory and to rule the world.

now one might object here that we are accostumed to think that jesus lived and died under pontius pilate as the gospels have it,who ruled until 37 AD.

yet it will appear clear to you by the end of my essay that this is a gospel lie,tout court.

there is no record/document/source whatsoever certainly attesting to a charismatic messianic jewish leader who was crucified under pontius pilate.

whereas there is ample testimony to a jesus - our jesus ben saffia - who fought and died around 66 AD.

and this jesus i'll proceed to show will look to you very familiar,very much like the gospel jesus but with inverted purposes and means.

now at bellum iudaicum II,20,4,566 flavius josephus who witnessed many of the events he describes in the book,albeit with a proroman bias,jewish turncoat that he was,introduces a jesus ben saffa,one of the high priests,elected to militarily preside over idumea first - a region near judea - and then galilee during the antiroman struggle.

now let us first notice how i'm calling him jesus ben that is son of in hebrew though i'd better say bar,the aramaic word for ben,because aramaic not hebrew was the current language in palestine at the time.

anyway josephus has arrived to us only in greek,but he originally wrote in aramaic and must have said something like yeshu'a bar saffa,which sounds suspiciously like jesus son of joseph doesnt'it to begin with...

now secondly josephus flavius tells us this jesus was one of the high priests.

the reader accostumed to 2000 years of gospel lie will object that gospel jesus is a poor carpenter's son...

but at the simon link quoted above i showed how the 4 canonic gospels are a pack of lies,so i refer the reader there after which he/she will have to concede that the minimum we can say about the poor carpenter's son story is that we have no evidence whatsoever corroborating it so we can only suspend judgement about it for the time being.

what if jesus son of joseph had instead really been one of the high priests as flavius' jesus bar saffa reportedly was?

since these high priesthoods were often handed down from father to son we might hypothesize that high priest jesus son of joseph may have been the son of joseph kaiaphas high priest from 18 to 36 AD,quite timely for jesus his son to be born in that timespan and...to be about 30 around 66...

but it gets more interesting.
bear with me...






jesus and john



now flavius josephus in his jewish war at this point knows exactly what he's talking about,because he too before switching sides had been assigned by jerusalem to be in charge of galilee's defence.

but since he was quite lukewarm already about fighting the mighty romans,the more radical jewish militants started blasting him as a traitor - which he turned out to be - and in the hippodrome of the town of tarichaeae on the sea -that is in jewish parlance lake - of galilee also called lake tiberias and lake gennesareth - the radicals kicked up a riot agains flavius,shouting he should be stoned or burned alive.

the chief instigators of the fuss says flavius were our jesus son of saffia - maybe better sapphia,variant of sappha flavius uses the first time he mentions him - and a john...

so there you have your gospel jesus and john the bapstist together albeit for a totally different purpose which is much more in harmony with the history of the times...

jesus bar sapphia had by then been assigned to governing tiberias,a nearby town also in galilee and also on the seashore that is lakeshore,very familiar to the reader from gospel lore...

so there you have your jesus just exactly were the gospels place him,in galilee,near the lake - but not out to perform miracles and give to caesar what's caesar's but instead out to fight caesar to the bitter end,alongside john...

note also how jesus bar sapphia that is son of joseph is a high priest in flavius and is assigned to galilee presumably from jerusalem,see of high priests.

i've already shown based on cascioli and eisenman at this link
arizona.indymedia.org/news/2005/08/29811.php
how the nazareth myth is a lie.

it may come from lake gen/nezareth though,i mean in the gospel's skewed misrepresentation,but the real jesus certainly could not possibly have been from nazareth if indeed nazareth even existed at the time,see link.

so jesus son of joseph really was:
1.a jewish high priest from jerusalem,maybe the son of joseph caiaphas high priest until 37 whom the gospel liars may have portrayed as condemning to death his own son
2.a theocommunist jewish militant radical,antiroman to boot,messianic but this-worldy,fighting the war for freedom from the romans and return to the golden david and maccabee era of jewish independence
3.this the real jesus really operated around the lake of galilee or tiberias or gennesareth,but as a military commander in chief not a meek miracle performer.






enter the romans



alright let's roll on.
flavius continues the jesus story at bellum iudaicum III,9,7450 ff:
here jesus bar sapphia becomes bar saphat but it's always the same jesus son of joseph in charge of defending galilee against the incoming roman army and jewish turncoats the likes of flavius.
who graciously says here that jesus commanded a band of brigands - today they'd say terrorists...
that is patriots,freedom fighters.
roman general vespasianus,soon to become emperor,with his son and fellow jew-butcherer titus,arrives near tiberias and proceeds to lay siege and build camps.
first he sends out officer valerianus and 50 horsemen to parlay with the patriots,who not only won't surrender but proceed to attack valerianus led by jesus who forces the romans to flee,but then when the bulk of the romans somehow manages to enter tiberias jesus and his men flee to nearby tarichaeae also on the lake..

now flavius informs us that both tiberias and tarichaeae lie at the feet of mountains - just like we know from the gospels' mount sermons of the doctored jesus...

and here comes the whole real story about boats on the lake and fishermen who become fishers of men.
the inhabitants of tarichaeae who evidently sided with jesus had readied a number of large boats on the adjoining lake both for the purpose of fleeing if things turned nasty and to fight a possible sea battle against the romans or pelt the romans from the lake that the jews call sea.

so the romans start building up their siege camp for tarichaeae but bold jesus' guerrillas assail them with hit-and-run guerrilla tactics.
a group of jewish fighters fights then from the boats,another from the plain in front of the city.
they have no fear of sinking like gospel simon...
instead it's the romans who dread the fury of the jews and titus has to rebuke them - which in the gospel lie becomes jesus rebuking simon and the others for their lack of faith.

no loaves and no fish are miraculously multiplied in the real story - the romans instead multiply as vespasianus sends heavy reinforcements to his beleaguered son.

eventually the jews on the plain have to flee,and others try desperately to join the fighters already on the boats.

this in the gospel misrepresentation becomes the storm that threatens to sink simon peter's boat...

the romans capture tarichaeae.
resistance continues on the lake.

vespasian joins titus in tarichaeae and congratulates for the slaughter...and orders that someone be put to death.

this is an all important point,because here you would expect the accounting for the capture and crucifiction of jesus - the punishemnt romans meted out on rebels.

instead.all manuscripts that handed down flavius' bellum iudaicum to us...contain a gap here so we don't know the name or names of those vespasian orders put to death!

coincidence - i'd rather say deliberate erasure on the part of later church rewriters who kept flavius' manuscripts under tight lock for centuries....

bear with me,there's more to come.




lacuna


the technical term for a gap in a manuscript is lacuna.
at flavius josephus jewish war III,10,6,505 there's a lacuna just where we expected to read jesus' name as the chief crucified by the romans for rebellion after the capture of tarichaeae on the lake of galilee.

but the church fathers would not let us realize who the real crucified jesus really was so they erased this bit most likely.

anyway it's pretty obvious just whose name is missing there and how the real jesus was put to death - the romans always crucified rebels except when they were roman citizens in which case they did them the favor of just beheading them thus cutting their suffering short.

and since tarichaeae lay at the feet of a mountain,it is likely the lacuna also told us that jesus was crucified on the mountain for all to see the macabre terroristic spectacle of how those who dared defy the romans ended...

anyway it's not over yet,because a bunch of heroic patriots are still resisting on the boats on the lake.
and their credo is no surrender.
so vespasian the terrorist orders rafts built to attack the lakeborne rebels.
around the lake of tiberias/galilee/gennezareth there was plenty of logging to be done so the job is quickly carried thru by the roman army's many...CARPENTERS!
who of course in the gospel twisting and distorting of facts become jesus' father joseph who was a poor carpenter from nazareth in galilee which didn't even exist but anyway centuries later when the current text of the gospels was finally concoted in its present form everybody would believe this crap in the west because they knew shit about palestinian geography and the few who did would accept the story because the lakeshores were very woody anyway so what more natural than being a carpenter in nazareth which in the meantime had been founded for real...

flavius now informs us also that the lake was rich in fish,and that's where the gospel lie of jesus' disciples /apostles as fishermen originates.

by now you will have started to grasp the modus operandi of those mischievous,westernized proroman gospel fabricators:
thay took bits and pieces of underlying truth from flavius josephus' book and rewrote the story turning the fighting jesus into a meek nonviolent poor guy only intent on healing the sick and chasing demons...
and multiplying loaves and fish for mass picnics on lake gennezareth.
what a sick twist.

so jesus son of joseph,high priest in jerusalem sent to galilee to fight the romans there becomes a little gandhi recommending to pay the roman tax which was the very reason the war and the real jesus were all about.

now the romans having built powerful rafts and packed them with legionaires proceed to slaughter the boatborne jews despite the latter's heroic resistance.
flavius depicts dramatically this epic scene of sinking boats and dying jews and lake reddening with their blood which the gospels turn into jesus walking on the water when in fact it was the romans who walked on the water aboard their rafts and it wasn't simon who was afraid of sinking in a storm but the real jews who sank and drowned with their boats...

none of them got out alive.





fishers of men



and now at last the gospel story of the fishermen called on by jesus to become apostles and fishers of men in the spiritual sense for afterworldly purposes.

the real jesus story in flavius ends much more graphically:
the romans having butchered all the jewish partisans on the boats,the lake got filled with corpses,and since it was still summer soon a terrible stink filled the air,and the boat wreckage and the dead were washed ashore,and the rot soon became overwhelmigly pestilent.

so when the gospel rewriters/overwriters edified us with the saying of the falsified jesus that now peter and andrew etc were to follow him and become fishers of men,what else could it be a distortion of if not of...

the tragic fact that,there certainly being real fishermen on the lake,which was so rich in various fish,those real fishermen in the aftermath of the battle went about resuming their daily fishing but since there were thousands of corpses in the lake,many of those who hadn't been washed ashore yet ended up getting stuck in the fishermen's nets who thus became fishers of (dead) men whereas in the gospel lie it's simon & co who prompted by jesus set out to fish and their catch is so plentiful they can hardly pull it up on board without sinking!

what a sick sadistic twist - what fun must it have been for the imperial gospel forgers to turn the slaughter into a fishing party and the dead into fish!

Another explanation,or one that could coexist with the first,is that the romans on the rafts may have included retiarii for close-quarter combat - the fighters with nets that got cast over the enemies to block them from being able to move and thus capture or butcher them more easily.

God in the unlikely case you exist,do not forgive the gospel fabricators - for they knew exactly what they were doing.

amen.
 
 

Donate

Views

Account Login

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software