Chicago Indymedia : http://chicago.indymedia.org/archive
Chicago Indymedia

News :: [none]

Dialogue With the "We did go to the Moon Author"

A few questions and points.

First I think there is a 50% chance we went to the Moon ("Luna" - that's our Earth's Moon's name, not Moon - Bet a lot of you didn't know that ?) and a 50% chance we did not.
Hello James Oberg

"We did go to the Moon Author"

(see post at bottom)

A few questions and points.

First I think there is a 50% chance we went to the Moon ("Luna" - that's our Earth's Moon's name, not Moon - Bet a lot of you didn't know that ?) and a 50% chance we did not.

First considering the Billions of dollars (in 1960s real moneydollars) that was spent on the Moon trips / hoax ?
And considering the federal govt spends $500 for toilet seats & $300 for hammers then doesn't $15,000 sound pretty trivial to research and write a book to defend that it was real ?

I and I believe most people are interested in the truth on this subject and will consider it with an open mind.

Just please be sure to cover explanations for each and every reason that the "we didn't go" people list on all their websites.

Explanations like NASA filmed some of the Astronauts on the Moon scenes on the Earth so that the Russians would not see our secret equipment type answers are pretty weak and hard to believe ! ?

As far as the govt not addressing the "We Didn't Go" claims, Because it would make the We Didn't Go claims look legitimate ?

Then is that why the govt won't address what Chemtrails are ? Because it might make the tens of millions of us who have seen them and developed sore throats and running noses while videotaping them seem sane ? And make my calling the control tower (run by the County) at Miami International Airport during chemtrail spraying and my call being
transferred to a professional double talker to handle it and then a week later my calling the local office of the FAA (a federal agency) during spraying and my call being transferred to the SAME man ? Not seem like
something strange ? !

I will be waiting for the book and give it a fair chance to explain the discrepancies claimed by the nay sayers.

Tom Buyea, Miami, Fla.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Self-Delusion about --
'NASA Admits Moon Hoax' ?

(from James Oberg)

Reply to: UFOpals (at) yahoogroups.com

NASA officials have always been divided about whether it's worth the effort to respond to 'Apollo was a hoax' claims, out of concern for fanning the flames because any response would be interpreted as supporting that theory -- just as NOT responding was interpreted by the hoax school as admitting there weren't good arguments. And that's one of
the criteria of a genuine crackpot theory -- that ANY item OR ITS COMPLETE OPPOSITE can be twisted into appearing to be supportive evidence. This is another wonderful example of that.

But the bigger issue -- of educating the general public, especially those without the understanding of space conditions and technology, who are the targeted audience for these theories -- means the book project is even more useful, especially now that it will not have to bear the
label 'approved by NASA'. The commercial offers continue to pour in.

Advice and suggestions are always welcome.
Jim Oberg

www.jamesoberg.com>www.jamesoberg.com
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
www.onelist.com/subscribe/UFOpals
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 
 

Donate

Views

Account Login

Media Centers

 

This site made manifest by dadaIMC software